You are here
Formation of the indicator system to assessment of reconstruction and use of human capital in agriculture
The article summarizes the methodological approaches of foreign and domestic scientists to the evaluation of the reproduction and use of human capital in agriculture and summarizes their positive and shortcomings. An estimation of the formation and use of human capital is proposed based on the determination of the profitability of human capital, in particular, the calculation of the income received for human capital, which allows to determine its value. The need to analyze the formation and use of human capital on the basis of an integrated system of indicators, taking into account the influence of numerous economic, social, institutional relations is proved. The system of indicators on the following groups is grounded: the first characterizes the formation of human capital, the second efficiency of its use, the third interdependence between the various indicators of these groups.
The factors influencing the value of indicators of reproduction and use of human capital are systematized, and the possibilities of their calculation are determined on the basis of the existing information and analytical base of agriculture. It is proved that the subsystem of human capital formation indicators allows characterizing the process of reproduction of human capital on the basis of calculating the correlation between the quality of human capital and the quality of life. It is noted that analytical calculations on this subsystem should become a basis for determining the directions of social infrastructure development, calculating the economic efficiency of investments in human capital and justifying the development of entrepreneurial abilities and leadership among the rural population.
It has been proved that it is expedient to study the productivity of the use of human capital by calculating the effectiveness of investments in human capital and comparing the obtained values with their returns in other spheres of the economy, and also on the basis of calculating the efficiency of using human capital in time and space. Obviously, the calculation of the indicators of the effectiveness of the use of human capital is carried out on the basis of the received actual result per unit of human capital, followed by a detailed analysis of its dynamics, factors affecting its absolute and relative values.
The author proves that the current conditions of the vimagayut are assessed the innovativeness of the human capital of agriculture with the obligatory identification of the main factors and the forms of their influence of human capital on the processes of organizing scientific and innovation activities in the system. It is proved that the index of the contribution of human capital to the change in the innovative potential of agriculture is characterized by the degree of influence of capital training, health capital and social identity capital on the organization of the processes of scientific and innovative activity and is determined by the level of the created added value of the group through: the effectiveness of information exchange of experience, branch; the effectiveness of participation of agricultural workers in the introduction of various forms of innovation; the level of readiness for the adoption of effective innovative solutions of industry workers; the level of quantitative characteristics of the impact of human capital on the results of scientific and innovative activities in agriculture.
Key words: human capital, reproduction of human capital, efficiency of human capital use, innovation of human capital.
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0297-74321. Mazina, O. (2012). Otsinka ta chynnyky rozvytku liudskoho kapitalu [Assessment and factors of development of human capital]. Visnyk KNTEU, no. 6. pp. 16-26.
2. Antoniuk V.P. (2007). Formuvannia ta vykorystannia liudskoho kapitalu v Ukraini: sotsialno-ekonomichna otsinka ta zabezpechennia rozvytku: [monohrafiia] [Formation and use of human capital in Ukraine: socio-economic assessment and development: [monograph]]. Donetsk, IEP, 347 p.
3. Pietukhova, T.O. (2010). Teoretychni aspekty formuvannia systemy otsinky liudskoho kapitalu na pidpryiemstvakh zaliznychnoho transport [Theoretical Aspects of Formation of the System of Human Capital Assessment at Railway Enterprises]. Torhivlia, komertsiia, pidpryiemnytstvo: zbirnyk naukovykh prats [Trade, Commerce, Entrepreneurship: Collection of Scientific Papers], no. 11, pp. 221-225.
4. Loseva, O.V., Russiyan, E.A. (2014). Assessment of the human intellectual capital dynamics in the region. Vestnik of Samara State University of Economics. no 6(80), pp. 61-64.
5. Theory and practice of human capital management companies: Foreign experience: [Journal Young Scientist],
no 4(07), pp. 119-122.
no 4(07), pp. 119-122.
6. Bulkhairova, et al. (2016). Assessment of Human Capital in the Agricultural Enterprises of the Republic of Kazakhstan. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, no 6(S5), pp. 53-64. URL: http: www.econjournals.com.
7. Suvorova , N.V., Suvorova, A.V., Grebennikovb , V.G., Ivanova, V.N., Balashovaa, E.E. and Boldov O.N. (2016). Assessment of the Impact of Human Capital on Economic Growth. Studies on Russian Economic Development. Vol 27. Issue 5. pp. 495–509.
8. Lyshylenko V.I., Ostrolutska I.O., Yakuba K.I. (1996). Trudovyi potentsial i otsinka yoho vidtvorennia v ahrarnii sferi [ Labor potential and evaluation of its reproduction in the agrarian sector.] Buhutskoho O.A. (ed.) Sotsialno-trudovyi potentsial ahrarnoi ekonomiky [Socio-Labor Potential of the Agrarian Economy]. K. LLC "Vita Complex", pp.77-104.
9. Petti U. (1940). Politicheskaia arifmetika (1676 g.) [Political arithmetic (1676)]. Ekonomicheskie i statisticheskie raboty [Economic and statistical work]. M., State social, Economic Publ. House, 324 p.
10. Strumylin S. H. (1957). Problemy ekonomiky pratsi [Problems of Labor Economics], 598 p.
11. Borodina O. M. (2003). Liudskyi kapital na seli: naukovi osnovy, stan, perspektyvy rozvytku: [monohrafiia] [The human capital in the village: scientific fundamentals, state, prospects of development: [monograph]]. Institute of agr. UAAS economy, 274 p.
12. Mykhailova L. I. (2008). Liudskyi kapital: formuvannia ta rozvytok v silskykh rehionakh [Human Capital: Formation and Development in the Rural Regions]. Kyiv. Center for the Study of Literature, 388 p.
13. Gary S. Becker. Human capital: a theoretical and empirical analysis with special reference to education. Business & Economics, 1993. 390 p.
14. Bitsch Vera, Balmann A. аnd Lissitsa A. (2003). Management of human resources in agriculture. Large Farm Management. AgriMedia, pp. 91-111.
15. Mors Alle (1995). Ekonomika kak nauka [Economics as a science], 357 p.
16. Prukinska E.V., Pereverzieva A.V. (2008). Pokhodzhennia, sutnist i rozvytok liudskoho kapitalu v umovakh suchasnykh rynkovykh peretvoren [The origin, essence and development of human capital in the conditions of modern market transformations]. Aktualni problemy ekonomiky [Current problems of the economy], no. 1, pp. 196-202.
17. Matkovskyy, R. (2010). Theoretical and methodological aspects of modelling and forecasting of states of agglomerations and clusters as the forms of meso-systems organization. In Clusters, Bi and global economy (international aspects). Drohobych-Jaslo, pp. 121–137.
18. Ponukalin A.A. (2013). Innovatcionnyi potentcial: sotcialnaia psikhologiia upravleniia: [monografiia] [Innovative potential: social psychology of management: [monograph]]. Saratov, The Sarat Publ. House University, 254 p.
19. Chechina O.S. (2014). Methods for calculating indicators of innovative development of the branch economic system [Metody rascheta pokazatelei innovatcionnogo razvitiia otraslevoi ekonomicheskoi sistemy]. Naukovedenie, no. 5 (24). Available at: https://naukovedenie.ru/PDF/76EVN414.pdf.
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
 hrynchuk_y._utechenko_d.1-2018.pdf | 8.31 MB |