You are here
The influence of institutional order on the functioning of the budget system: theoretical analysis
The purpose of the article is to improve the theoretical foundations and provide a scientific substantiation of approaches to increasing the efficiency of the budget system functioning based on high-quality institutional support. The relevance of the research is driven by the need to modernize public financial management in the context of dynamic macroeconomic transformations. Particular attention is paid to the comprehensive impact of a perfect institutional order on the stability, transparency, and effectiveness of the budget process. The essence of the institutional environment is clarified, and its key strengths are identified within the context of optimizing the allocation of budget resources. In the course of the research, the factors contributing to the emergence of institutional deformations in the budget system that limit its potential are systematically identified and classified. On this basis, promising directions for the institutionalization of financial control are substantiated. It is proven that such control within the modern institutional environment should act not merely as an oversight tool, but as an updated regulatory element of management and an effective feedback mechanism. A special place in the study is occupied by the analysis of transaction costs; the authors graphically and theoretically demonstrate their direct dependence on the method of organizing the budget system and the level of perfection of the current institutional order. The methodological basis of the study comprises systemic and evolutionary approaches, the application of which allowed for viewing the transformation of the institutional environment as a holistic, historically determined process with its own internal connections, dependencies, and unique logic of development. The scientific novelty of the work lies in the systematic disclosure of the institutional order, the identification of the mechanisms of its impact on the efficiency of budget funds utilization, as well as in the formation of a new paradigm of institutional support for the financial system. Based on the research results, it is concluded that the interaction between society, the state, and financial institutions is based on a dynamic system of institutional constraints that define the "rules of the game" in the budget sphere. It is argued that institutions serve as a fundamental basis for understanding how fiscal policy affects long-term economic development (or stagnation) and the overall level of public well-being. It is proven that in the long-term perspective, the stability of the budget system directly depends on the maturity of the institutional order and the capacity of institutions to adapt to global challenges.
Keywords: institutions of the budget system, institutional order, budget process, institutional environment, budget. budget system, institutional theory.
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0677-18721. Yukhymenko, P. I. (2024). Ukrayinsʹka ekonomichna dumka u svitoviy ekonomichniy nautsi kintsya XIX – pochatku XX st.: heneza, teoretychni koliziyi ta praktychna kontseptualizatsiya [Ukrainian economic thought in world economic science of the late 19th – early 20th centuries: genesis, theoretical collisions and practical conceptualization]. Istoriya narodnoho hospodarstva ta ekonomichnoyi dumky Ukrayiny. Vyp.57. S.43–73.
2. Adzhemohlu, D., Robinson, Dzh. (2017). Chomu natsiyi zanepadayutʹ. Pokhodzhennya vlady, bahat·stva ta bidnosti [Why nations decline. The origin of power, wealth and poverty]. Kyiv: Nash format. 440 p.
3. Villiamson, O. E. (2001). Ekonomichni instytuty kapitalizmu: firmy, marketynh, ukladannya kontraktiv [Economic institutions of capitalism: firms, marketing, contracting]. Kyiv: ArtEk, 472 p.
4. Pryroda firmy: pokhodzhennya, evolyutsiya i rozvytok [The Nature of the Firm: Origin, Evolution and Development] (2002) / za red. O.E. Vilʹyamsona, S.Dzh. Vintera; per. p anhl. A.V. Kulykova. Kyiv: ASK, 336 p.
5. Weingast, B. R. (2014). Second Generation Fiscal Federations for Decentralized Democratic Governance and Economic Development. World Development. No. 53. P. 14-25.
6. Olson, M. (2004). Lohika kolektyvnoyi diyi. Suspilʹni blaha y teoriya hrup [he Logic of Collective Action. Public Goods and Group Theory]. Slukhaya. Kyiv : Libra, 272 p.
7. Olson, M. (2007). Vlada y protsvitannya: podolannya komunistychnykh i kapitalistychnykh dyktatur [Power and Prosperity: Overcoming Communist and Capitalist Dictatorships] / per. z anhl.. A.Ishchenka. Kyyiv: V. D «Kyyevo-Mohylyansʹka akademiya», 2007. 174 p.
8. Ostrom, E. (2012). Keruvannya spilʹnym. Evolyutsiya instytutsionalʹnykh diy [Managing the Common. The Evolution of Institutional Action] / per. z anhl. T. Montyan. Kyyiv: Nash chas, 398 p.
9. Piketti, T. (2017). Kapital u KHKHI stolitti [Capital in the 21st Century] / per. z anhl.. N. Paliy. Kyyiv: Nash format, 646 p.
10. Raynert, E. S. (2015). Yak bahati krayiny zabahatily.. i chomu bidni krayiny zalyshayutʹsya bidnymy [How rich countries got rich.. and why poor countries stay poor] / per. z anhl. P. Tarashchuka. Kyyiv: Tempora, 444 p.
11. Ferhyuson, N. (2017). Evolyutsiya hroshey. Finansova istoriya svitu [The Evolution of Money. A Financial History of the World]. Kyiv: Nash format, 2017. 384 p.
12. Chukhno, A. A., Yukhymenko, P. I., Leonenko, P. M. Suchasni ekonomichni teoriyi: pidruchnyk [Modern economic theories]. K.: Znannya-Pres, 2007. 878 p.
13. Instytutsiyna arkhitektonika ta dynamika ekonomichnykh peretvorenʹ [Institutional architecture and dynamics of economic transformations] (2008) K.: Fort, 928 p.
14. Bodakovsky, V., Morozyuk, O. (2018) Impetus systematis fiscalis in functionem infrastructurae institutionalis pecuniariae in Ucraina [The impact of the budget system on the functioning of the financial institutional infrastructure in Ukraine.]. Formatio oeconomiae mercatus in Ucraina. Fasciculus 1. Pars 1. P. 31–35.
15. Eme, T., Primerova, O. (2023) Systema fiscalis Ucrainae: impetus belli et provocationes reconstructionis post bellum [The budget system of Ukraine: the impact of the war and the challenges of post-war reconstruction.]. Notae scientifikae NaUKMA. Scientiae Oeconomicae. Volumen 8. Fasciculus 1. P. 17–24.
16. Zaluzhna, Z. V. (2024) Influentia institutionalis civitatis in efficaciam functionis mechanismi fiscalis auctoritatum publicarum Ucrainae: aspectus theoretici et modi practici [The budget system of Ukraine: the impact of the war and the challenges of post-war reconstruction.]. Economia et Societas. Fasciculus 70.
17. (In)capacitas institutionalis civitatis in Ucraina: quomodo circulum vitiosum frangere: monographia [Institutional (in)capacity of the state in Ukraine: how to break the vicious circle: monograph] (2025) / coauctores: Galina Zelenko (editrix, editor scientifica) et alii. Kioviae: Institutum I. F. Kuras Technologiae Informationis et Communicationis Academiae Nationalis Scientiarum Ucrainae, 480 p.
18. Gunko, K. A. (2023) Principia institutionalia progressionis moderationis pecuniariae civitatis [Institutional principles of the development of state financial control.]. Pertinentia argumenti investigationis. Pecunia, circulatio pecuniae, creditum. Acta Oeconomica Universitatis | Fasciculus Numerus 57. P. 128 – 132. URL: https://doi.org/10.31470/2306- 546X-2023-57-126-132
19. Aspectus Institutionales Evolutionis Systematis Budgetarii: Theoria et Praxis Ucrainae [Institutional Aspects of Development of Budget System: Theory and Practice of Ukraine] (2024) / Rogovskii, I. L., Reznik, N. P., Osadchuk, N. V., Melnyk, L. Y., Ryzhakova, H. Studia in Systematibus, Decisione et Moderatione, 489. P. 925–937.
20. Onyshchenko, S. V., Berezhna, A. Yu., Filonych, O. M. (2021) Mechanismus Budgetarius: modi methodologici et praxis decentralizationis budgetariae [Budget mechanism: methodological approaches and practice of budget decentralization.]. Problemata Oeconomiae. No. 1 (47), 2021. P. 107 – 122.
21. Skrypnyk, G. O., Chernenko, V. V. (2024) Imperium pecuniarium publicum Ucrainae sub lege martiali [State financial control of Ukraine under martial law.]. Oeconomia et societas. Fasciculus 70.
22. Hodgson, J. M. (2002). Introduction. A Modern Reader in Institutional and Evolutionary Economics. Key Concepts. Cheltenham : Edward Elgan, 240 p.
23. Pyrih, S. (2022). Digitalization of public administration and E-democracy at the regional level. Economic Forum, Vol. 12, no. 3. P. 107–113.
24. Hernandez, A. C. Ch., Hernandez, G. de V. J. J., Perez Prieto, M. E., Pinto, L. B., Martinez, E. G. (2024). Analysis of the e-Government development index in the regions. Procedia Computer Science, Vol. 231. P. 559–565.
25. Fedosov, V., Paientko, T. (2019). Opportunistic government behavior: How controlling approaches in public management can prevent it. Zeszyty Teoretyczne Rachunkowości. № 104(160)). P. 21-30.
26. Furubotn, E. G. (2005). Institutions and Economic Theory: Achievements of the New Institutional Economic Theory. Published by: University of Michigan Press. 150 p.
27. Furubotn, E. G., Richter, R. (2000) Institutions and Economic Theory: The Contribution of the New Institutional Economics. Journal of Public Finance and Public Choice. № 18 (2): P. 187–189.
28. Mr. Jack Diamond. (2006). Budget System Reform in Emerging Economies. The Challenges and the Reform Agenda. International Monetary Fund. Washington. 21 Apr. 120 p.
29. Paul Newton. (2015). Managing the Project Budget. Project Skills. 55 p.
30. Geoffrey M. Hodgson. (2000). What Is the Essence of Institutional Economics? Journal of Economic Issues. Vol. 34. No. 2. P. 317–329. Journal of Economic Issues. 2000. Vol. 34, No. 2. Р. 317-329.
31. Geoffrey Martin Hodgson. John R. (2003). Commons and the Foundations of Institutional Economics. Journal of Economic. Issues 37(3). P. 546–574.
32. Kotlyarevskyy, Ya. V., Sokolovska, A. M. (2021). Theoretical and Applied Aspects of the Development of Reform Institutions in Global and National Context. Sci. in nov. V. 17. No. 5. P. 3–19.
33. Arestis, Ph. (2011). Fiscal Policy is Still an Effective Instrument of Macroeconomic Polic. Panoeconomicus. No. 2. P. 143–156.
34. Lars Calmfors. (2015). The Roles of Fiscal Rules, Fiscal Councils and Fiscal Union in EU Integration IFN Working Paper No. 1076. Research Institute of Industrial Economic. Stockholm, Sweden. P. 3–25.
35. Langedijk, S., Larch, M. (2011). Testing the EU Fiscal Surveillance: How Sensitive is it to Variations in Output Gap Estimates? International Review of Applied Economics. Vol. 3. No. 1. P. 39–60.
36. Derzhavnyy borh Ukrayiny [State Debt of Ukraine]. (2009-2018). URL. https://index.minfin. com.ua/ua/finance/debtgov/)
37. Kanyeva, T. V., Stadnik, O. O. (2023). Fiskalʹna polityka yak instrument rehulyuvannya ekonomiky [Fiscal Policy as an Instrument of Economic Regulation.]. Ekonomika ta suspilʹstvo. Vypusk No. 57.
38. Fridman, M. (2017). Kapitalizm i svoboda [Capitalism and Freedom.]. Per. z anhl. Nelya Rohachevsʹka. K. : Nash Format, 216 p.
39. Sidor, M. Vplyv tsyfrovizatsiyi na byudzhetnu systemu Ukrayiny [The Impact of Digitalization on the Budget System of Ukraine]. (2024). Yurydychnyy naukovyy elektronnyy zhurnal. No. 4. P. 467–471.
40. Manual on fiscal transparency/Fiscal Affairs Dept. (2007). International Monetary Fund-[Washington, D. C.]: International Monetary Fund, 154 p.
41. Fedosov, V., Yukhymenko, P. (2018). Instytutsionalizatsiya seredovyshcha i yoho vplyv na formuvannya i vykorystannya byudzhetnykh resursiv derzhavy [Institutionalization of the environment and its impact on the formation and use of state budget resources]. Zhurnal «Rynok Tsinnykh Paperiv Ukrayiny», No. 1-2. P. 3–14.
42. Ishengoma, F., Shao, D. (2025). A framework for aligning e-government initiatives with the sustainable development goals. Journal of Innovative Digital Transformation, Vol. 2. No. 1. P. 73–89.
43. Lubis, S., Purnomo, E.P., Lado, J., Hung, Ch-F. (2024). Electronic governance in advancing sustainable development goals through systematic literature review. Discovglobsoc. Vol. 2. No. 77. 21 p.
44. Munir, S., Sadiq, S., Abbas, N., Rasul, F. (2024). E-Governance initiatives and citizen participation at global perspective: systematic literature review. Sustainable Business and Society in Emerging Economies. Vol. 6. No. 3. P. 317–337.
45. Pro stymulyuvannya rozvytku tsyfrovoyi ekonomiky v Ukrayini [On Stimulating the Development of the Digital Economy in Ukraine] (2025): Zakon Ukrayiny. Verkhovna Rada Ukrayiny.
46. Pro zatverdzhennya planu diy iz vprovadzhennya Initsiatyvy «Partnerstvo «Vidkrytyy Uryad» u 2023-2025 rokakh [On approval of the action plan for the implementation of the Open Government Partnership Initiative in 2023-2025] (2023): Rozporyadzhennya KMU vid 17 lystopada 2023. No. 1049- 47. Pro skhvalennya Kontseptsiyi rozvytku elektronnoho uryaduvannya v Ukrayini [On approval of the Concept of e-Government Development in Ukraine]. (2017). No. 649-p.
48. Savveli, I., Rigou, M., Balaskas, S. (2025). From e-Governmentto AI e-Government: A systematic review of citizen attitudes. Informatics, Vol. 12. No. 98. P. 2–42.
49. Synthesis Report. Analysis of the digital democracy ecosystem. (2025). Digital Democracy Initiative, March 26. 104 p.
50. Kolodko, G. W. (2006). The World Economy and Great Post-communist Change. New York: Nova Science Publishers, Inc., 194 p.
51. Pushkar, O. A. (2025). Ponyattya informatsiynoho suspilʹstva ta informatsiynoho prostoru yak obʺyektiv derzhavnoyi informatsiynoyi polityky [The concept of information society and information space as objects of state information policy]. Investytsiyi: praktyka ta dosvid. № 2. P. 199–202.
52. Onofrei, M., Toader, T., Vatamanu, A. and Oprea, F. (2021). Impact of Governments’ Fiscal Behaviors on Public Finance Sustainability: A Comparative Study. Sustainability, 13(7), 3739.
53. Gasanov, S., Ivashchenko, O., Bartosh, S., Klymenko, K., Ukhnal, N. (2024). Transformation of the budget system of Ukraine in the face of extraordinary challenges and threats. Financial and credit activity: problems of theory and practice. Vol. 1 (54). P. 84-101.
54. Shirley, M. M. (2009). Institutions and Development. Cheltenham UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, 240 p.
55. Frédéric Docquier. (2014). Identifying the effect of institutions on economic growth. FNRS and IRES, Université Catholique de Louvain. Forthcoming in: Schmiegelow, H. & M. Schmiegelow (eds.). Institutional Competition between Common Law and Civil Law: Theory and Policy, Springer, 21 p.
56. North, D., Wallis, J., Webb, S. (2012). In the Shadow of Violence: Lessons for Limited Access Societies. Voprosy Ekonomiki. № 3(3). P. 1–31.
57. Howden, D. (2011). Institution in Crisis: European Perspective on the Recession. UK: Edward Elgar Publishing. 264 p. 58. Alston Lee J. and Melo Marcus André and Mueller Bernardo and Pereira Carlos (2016), Why Countries Transition? The Case of Brazil, 1964– 2016 (June 5, 2016). Atlantic Economic Journal, P. 1–28, June.
59. Shirley. M. M. (2011). World Development Report 2011: Conflict, Security and Development / World Bank. Washington DC. 60 p.
60. Chong. A., Calden. C. Causality and Fedback between Institutional Measures and Economic. Growth. Economics and Politics. 2000. Vol. 12. No. 1. P. 69-81. URL: http://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ecopol/ v12y2000ilp69-81.html
61. Yukhymenko. P., Zagurskiy. O., Sokolska. T., Khukhula. B. (2018). Polishchuk Institutional Providing Reforming of Ukrainian Budget System in the Conditions of Eurointegration. International Journal of Management and Business Research. June. No. 8 (1). P. 173–183.
62. Sidor, M. I., Omelʹchenko, I. I. (2024). Byudzhetna systema Ukrayiny v suchasnykh umovakh [Budgetary system of Ukraine in modern conditions]. Juris Europensis Scientia. Vyp. 1. P. 112–119.
63. Sochka, K., Pekchi, O. (2025). Defitsyt byudzhetu: prychyny vynyknennya na natsionalʹnomu ta mistsevomu rivnyakh [Budget deficit: causes of occurrence at the national and local levels.]. Acta Academiae Beregsasiensis. Economics. Vol. 9. P. 306–318.
64. Bruce, E. Kaufman. (2008). The Institutional Economics of John R. Commons: Complement and Substitute for Neoclassical Economic Theory. Socio-Economic Review. № 5(1). P. 3–45.
65. Douglass, C. North. (2005). Understanding the Process of Economic Change. Princeton University Press. Princeton and Oxford. 200 p.
66. Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S. (2005). Undundling Institutions. Journal of Political Economy. Vol. 113. № 5. P 949–995.
67. Tanzi, V., Davoodi, H. (2000). Corruption, Growth and Public Finance. IMF Working Paper № 00/182 : IMF Washington. November, P. 1–23
68. John, R. Commons. (1959). Institutional Economics. Its place in political economy. The university of Wisconsin press. 484 p.
69. Helmke, G., Levitsky, S. (2003). Informal institutions and comparative politics: a research agenda. Cambridge. Working Paper № 307, September 2003. Cambridge University Press, 33 p.
70. Indeks koruptsiyi SRI-2017 [Corruption Perceptions Index CPI-2017]. URL. https://ti-ukraine. org/research/indeks-koruptsiyi-cpi-2017
71. Indeks spryynyattya koruptsiyi [Corruption Perceptions Index], 2024 (2025). Transparency International. 11.02.
72. Sytnichenko, L. A. (2021). Filosofiya svobody Dzh. Rolza: metodolohichni zasady, mezhi ta perspektyvy [Rawls's Philosophy of Freedom: Methodological Principles, Limits and Prospects]. Mulʹtyversum. Filosofsʹkyy alʹmanakh. Vypusk 1(173). Tom 1. P. 44–56.
73. Dahlas Nort. (2000). Instytutsiyi, instytutsiyna zmina ta funktsionuvannya ekonomiky [Institutions, institutional change and the functioning of the economy]. Per. z anhl. Ivan Dzyub. Fond "OSIZUG”. 196 p.
74. Marquez, A. (1990). The Other Path by Hernando De Soto, Boston College Third. World Law Journal. Vol. 10 (197). P. 204–213.
75. Mises, L. (2007). Theories and History: The Internationalization of Socioeconomic Evolution. Reprint in 2007 by the Ludwig von Mises Institute. 404 p. Chapter 3.2.
76. Voynarenko, M. P. (2014). Clusters in the Institytional Economics : monograph. Wloclawek: ESFII, Poland. 335 p.
77. Bardhan, P. (2000). Capture and Governance at Local and National Levels / P. Bardhan, D. Mookherjee. American Economic Review. Vol. 90. № 2. P. 135–139.
78. Douglass C. North, John Joseph Wallis, and Barry R. Weingast Violence and Social Orders. (2009). A Conceptual Framework for Interpreting Recorded Human History. Cambridge University Press. 328 p.
79. Blankart Sharlʹ. (2000). Derzhavni finansy v umovakh demokratiyi : Vstup do finansovoyi nauky [Public Finance in a Democratic Environment: Introduction to Financial Science] / per. z nim. S.I. Tereshchenko, O.O. Tereshchenko. Peredmova ta nauk. red. V.M. Fedosova. K.: Lybidʹ. 272 p.
80. Arthur. W. B. (2010). Complexity the Santa Fe approach and non-equilibrium economics. History of Economic Ideas. Vol. 8. № 2. P. 149–166.
81. Hantinhton. S. (2019). Politychnyy poryadok v minlyvykh suspilʹstvakh [Political Order in Changing Societies]: Per. s anhl. Наш формат. 448 p.
82. Nir K. (2010). Business Perception of Requlative Institutions in Central and Eastern Europe. Baltic Journal of Management. 2010. Vol. 5. № 3. P. 356–377.
83. Bʺyukenen Dzh. M., Makgreyv R. A. (2004). Suspilʹni finansy i suspilʹnyy vybir: dva protylezhni bachennya derzhavy [Public finance and public choice: two opposing visions of the state]: per. z anhl.: A.V. Ishchenko; nauk. red.: S. Slukhay. K.: Vyd. Dim «KM Akademiya». 175 p.
84. Instytutsionalizatsiya publichnoho upravlinnya ta administruvannya u konteksti innovatsiynoho rozvytku silʹsʹkykh terytoriy: teoriya i praktyka [Institutionalization of public management and administration in the context of innovative development of rural areas: theory and practice:]: monohrafiya (2018). / A. S. Danylenko ta in. ; za zah. red. d-ra ekon. nauk, profesora Danylenka A. S. Tsentr uchbovoyi literatury. 320 p.
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
 ekon_1-2026-22-45.pdf | 1.41 MB |