You are here
Substantiation of principles of management of economic stability of agricultural enterprises
The article considers the components of managing the economic sustainability of agricultural enterprises as an open system that is able to withstand the factors of the environment of its operation. It is argued that the resilience of economic entities should be considered as the ability of the production system under the influence of negative factors to return to normal and resist threats from their own and / or borrowed resources. It is established that the economic stability of the enterprise is a complex characteristic that characterizes the impact on the business entity of various external factors and internal changes, providing it with adaptability, flexibility, competitiveness, dynamism, efciency. It is substantiated that the economic stability of an agricultural enterprise is defned as a characteristic of maintaining its integrity and equilibrium functioning, in which economic and managerial decisions are able to regulate the main factors of steady state. It is proposed to consider the management of economic sustainability of agricultural enterprises as a system of management measures and actions aimed at anticipating the manifestation of crisis phenomena in economic activity and their detection at early stages, as a result it will be possible to maintain sustainable and creating new competitive advantages. It is argued that management decisions to restore or strengthen the economic stability of the enterprise should be based on the principles of adaptability, synergy, self-organization, advanced management, rapid response and rationality. Exogenous and endogenous factors that cause loss of economic stability of agricultural enterprises are systematized. It is proved that the economic stability of the enterprise can be restored only on the basis of the effectiveness of the management system of sound anti-crisis strategies that take into account the effects of external and internal environment. Measures, principles, tools and methods that form the mechanism of sustainable development management of the business entity are identifed.
Key words: economic stability, balanced development, agricultural enterprises, management system, management process.
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2156-16511. Vinichenko, I.I., Koms'ka, M.M. (2021). Teoretychni aspekty formuvannja antykryzovoi' stijkosti sil's'kogospodars'kyh pidpryjemstv. [Theoretical aspects of formation of anti-crisis stability of agricultural enterprises]. Agrosvit, no 12, pp. 3–8. DOI: 10.32702/2306-6792.2021.12.3
2. Artimonova, I.V. (2015). Teoretyko-metodychni aspekty traktuvannja kategorii' «stijkosti sil's'kogospodars'kyh pidpryjemstv». [Theoretical and methodological aspects of interpretation of the category "sustainability of agricultural enterprises"]. Ekonomika ta upravlinnja APK. [Economics and management of agro-industrial complex]. No 2, pp. 49–55.
3. Kozlovs'kyj, S.V., Mazur, G.F. (2017). Zabezpechennja stijkosti suchasnoi' ekonomichnoi' systemy – osnova ekonomichnogo rozvytku derzhavy. [Ensuring the stability of the modern economic system is the basis of economic development of the state]. Investycii': praktyka ta dosvid. [Investments: practice and experience]. No 1, pp. 5–12.
4. Rad'ko, V.I. (2018). Teoretyko-metodychni pidhody do traktuvannja kategorii' «ekonomichna stijkist'». [Theoretical and methodological approaches to the interpretation of the category "economic stability"]. Zbirnyk naukovyh prac' Tavrijs'kogo derzhavnogo agrotehnologichnogo universytetu (ekonomichni nauky). [Collection of scientifc works of the Tavriya State Agrotechnological University (economic sciences)]. No 3 (38), pp. 23–35.
5. Sitak, I.L. (2021). Upravlinnja ekonomichnoju stijkistju pidpryjemstva: avtoref. dys. ... kand. ekon. nauk: spec. 08.00.04. Nac. tehn. un-t «Harkiv. politehn. in-t». [Management of economic stability of the enterprise: author's ref. dis. ... cand. econ. Science: special. 08.00.04. Nat. tech. Kharkiv University Polytechnic Inst.]. Harkiv, 20 p.
6. Soroka, K.O. (2005). Osnovy teorii' system i systemnogo analizu [Fundamentals of systems theory and systems analysis]. Harkiv: PP Tymchenko, 288 p. URL: https://www.studmed.ru/soroka-ko-osnovi-teoryi-sistem-sistemnogoanalzu_9...
7. Ponomarenko, T.V. (2016). Ocinjuvannja ekonomichnoi' stijkosti pidpryjemstva na osnovi vartisnogo pidhodu. [Estimation of economic stability of the enterprise on the basis of the cost approach]. Ekonomichnyj analiz: zb. nauk. prac'. [Economic analysis: coll. science. proceedings]. Vol. 24, no 2, pp. 106–113.
8. Aref'jeva, O.V., Gorodyns'ka, D.M. (2008). Ekonomichna stijkist' pidpryjemstva: sutnist', skladovi ta zahody i'i' zabezpechennja. [Economic stability of the enterprise: the essence, components and measures to ensure it.]. Aktual'ni problemy ekonomiky. [Current economic problems]. No 8 (86), pp. 83–90.
9. Slupjan, K.V. (2011). Upravlinnja ekonomichnoju stijkistju pidpryjemstv cukrovoi' promyslovosti: avtoref. dys. ... kand. ekon. nauk: [Management of economic stability of the sugar industry enterprises: author's ref. dis. ... cand. econ. Science]: 08.00.04. Bilocerkiv. nac. agrar. un-t. Bila Cerkva. 20 p.
10. Rudych, O.O., Gerasymenko, I.O., Tkachenko, K.V. (2017). Teoretyko-organizacijni pidhody do formuvannja stijkosti vyrobnyctva zernovyh kul'tur v sil's'kogospodars'kyh pidpryjemstvah [Theoretical and organizational approaches to the formation of sustainability of grain production in agricultural enterprises]. Innovacijna ekonomika. No 1–2 (67), pp. 53–59.
11. Aranchij, V.I. (2012). Integral'ni pidhody do ocinjuvannja ekonomichnoi' stijkosti agrarnyh pidpryjemstv. [Integrated approaches to assessing the economic sustainability of agricultural enterprises]. Naukovi praci Poltavs'koi' derzhavnoi' agrarnoi' akademii'. [Scientifc works of Poltava State Agrarian Academy]. Poltava: PDAA, pp. 10–12.
12. Pokropyvnyj, S.F. (2000). Ekonomika pidpryjemstva: pidruchnyk. [Business economics: a textbook]. Kyi'v: Naukova dumka, 473 p.
13 Kovalenko, N.V. (2019). Systema upravlinnja rozvytkom pidpryjemstva ta i'i' skladnyky. [Enterprise development management system and its components]. Problemy systemnogo pidhodu v ekonomici. [Problems of system approach in economics]. Iss. 4(1), pp. 98–107.
14. Zgurovs'kyj, M.Z. (2011). Systemnyj analiz: problemy, metodologija, zastosuvannja: navch. posib. [System analysis: problems, methodology, application]. Kyi'v: Naukova dumka, 726 p.
15. Kaljuzhna, N.G. (2011). Analiz pidhodiv do vyznachennja systemy upravlinnja pidpryjemstvom. [Analysis of approaches to determining the enterprise management system]. Visnyk Hmel'nyc'kogo nacional'nogo universytetu. [Bulletin of Khmelnytsky National University]. No 2. URL: http://journals.khnu.km.ua/ vestnik/ pdf/ekon/2011_2_2/050-053.pdf
16. Kasych, A., Vochozka, M. (2017). Teoretikal and methodical principles of managing of managing enterprise sustainable development. Marketing and innovation management. No 2. URL: http://mmi.fem.sumdu.edu.ua/sites/default/files/ mmi2017_2_298_305.pdf
17. Dovgan' L.Je., Veduta L.L., Shkrobot M.V. Suchasni koncepcii' upravlinnja organizacijamy: navch. posib. [Modern concepts of organization management: textbook]. Kyi'v: KPI im. Igorja Sikors'kogo, 2018. 278 p.
18. Fathutdinov, R.A. (2000). Strategicheskij marketing. [Strategic Marketing]. Moscow: Business School «Intel – Sintez», 640 p.
19. Ansof, I. (1989). Strategicheskoe upravlenie. [Strategic management]. Moscow: Economics, 519 p.
20. Ekonomichna encyklopedija [Economic Encyclopedia] / S.V. Mochernyj vidp. red. Kyi'v: «Akademija», 2002. Vol. 2. 846 p.
21. Daft, Richard. L & Marcic, Dorothy (2013). Management The New Workplace (8th ed). Canada: South Western Cengage Learning. 786 p.
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
 bachinskiy_1_2022.pdf | 443.77 KB |