You are here
Development of cooperative and integration relations in pig production industry
The article deals with the study of the issue of cooperative and integration relations developmentin pig production industry. It was proved that integration, as well as cooperation, reflect basically the same process - production and economic cooperation of economic entities engaged in different types of production and economic activities. However, they are parts of the technological process aimed to improve the efficiency of final production or worksperformance and servicesprovision.
It was found out that setting the conditions for effective development of pig farming in domestic agricultural enterprises requires strengthening the development of integration and cooperation on the basis of long-term partnerships for small, medium and large agricultural enterprises - pig products manufacturers.
It is obvious that small farms with a pig population of up to 50 heads must intensify the process of cooperatives establishmentand cooperativesfunctioning improvement in order to increase the efficiency of pig production and ensure product competitiveness, especially in the domestic market. These farms need to be involved in competitive pork supply chains based on the organization of slaughterhouses, transportation process, products preparation for sale, use of local brands, pork processing based on regional traditions, organization of modern forms of wholesale and retail trade.
The analysis of tendencies and features of development of cooperation in agriculture based on surveys involving heads and leading experts of the pig meat production as well as generalizations of researchresults of the Ukrainian scientists give the grounds to recommend certain models of production cooperation in pig breeding. These include establishing agricultural production cooperatives (APC) on the basis of highly marketable personal peasant farmsrising three pigs and more and owning over 1 hectare of landarea within one settlement. Cooperation can be used to unite land plots owned by APCs into a single array for the purpose of their mechanized cultivation and growing agricultural crops for pig feed. It also providesestablishing highly concentrated agricultural production cooperatives on the basis of unprofitable farms of the corporate sector of other organizational and legal forms of management with a clear division of specialized structural units operating on the basis of internal settlement.
Thus, the development of integration processes has become of strategic importance, primarilydue to the need to stabilize the production process of pig products in agricultural enterprises, to restore broken industrial and economic relationships, parity of all industries and economic entitiesinterests. Pig producers are participants in integration processes and they aim to reduce the productionassociated risk, its dependence on climatic conditions, the spontaneity of the pig and feed productsmarket, the need to increase the productioncompetitiveness. Processing companies also seek to focus on obtaining stable incomes, which requires сreating a reliable raw material base and beingthe marketsparticipants.
It was proved that incorporation of a large number of structural units with commodity relationsis the common feature of agricultural production cooperatives and vertically integrated structures. However, the difference between these organizational and legal formsis worth pointing noting - structural units of agricultural holdings are mostly legal entities while agricultural cooperatives do not have such a status. However, both of the above-mentioned organizational and legal forms of settlement use the cost component, i.e.transfer prices, which are similar to domestic onesin their economic nature. Therefore, the proposed approaches to the introduction of transfer pricing can be used both in agricultural production cooperatives and in vertically integrated structures.
Key words: integration, cooperation, agricultural cooperatives, agroholdings, pig breeding, production, sales.
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1335-23311. Onegina V.M. (2018). Derzhavna agrarna polityka ta pidtrymka tvarynnyctva v Ukrai'ni. [State agricultural policy and support of animal husbandry in Ukraine]. Visnyk Harkivs'kogo nacional'nogo tehnichnogo universytetu sil's'kogo gospodarstva im. P. Vasylenka. Iss. 191, pp. 77–91.
2. Danylenko, A.S., Varchenko, O.M., Rudych, O.O. (2011). Sil's'kogospodars'ka kooperacija: zarubizhnyj dosvid ta perspektyvy vprovadzhennja u vitchyznjanu praktyku: kolektyvna monografija [gricultural cooperation: foreign experience and prospects for implementation in domestic practice: a collective monograph]. Bila Cerkva. 259 p.
3. Varchenko O., Svynous I., Grynchuk Y., Tkachenko K., Shust O. (2018). The strategy of developing agricultural supply chain in terms of food security in Ukraine. International Journal of Supply Chain Management, Vol. 7. No 5, pp. 657–666. Available at: file:///C:/Users/user/Downloads/2358-8100-2-PB.pdf
4. Ljenivova G.V. (2014). Modeljuvannja potencijnogo vplyvu ZVT mizh Ukrai'noju ta JeS na strukturu importu produkcii' tvarynnyctva [Modeling the potential impact of the FTA between Ukraine and the EU on the structure of imports of livestock products]. Ekonomika i prognozuvannja. No 1, pp. 139–144.
5. Myhajlova O.A. (2018). Tendencyy razvytyja myrovogo svynovodstva [Trends in the development of world pig breeding]. Vesnyk agrarnoj nauky. Vol. 1b. No 70, pp. 36-45. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/tendentsii-razvitiya-mirovogo-svinovod...
6. Douglas, S.L., Szyszka, O., Stoddart, K., Edwards, S.A., Kyriazakis, I. (2015). Animal and management factors influencing grower and finisher pig performance and efficiency in European systems: A meta-analysis. Animal. Vol. 9. Iss. 7, pp. 1210–1220. DOI: 10.1017/S1751731115000269.
7. Mazur A.G. (2019). Instytucional'ne zabezpechennja rozvytku gospodarstv simejnogo typu v sil's'kyh terytorijah Ekonomika [Institutional support for the development of family-type farms in rural areas Economy]. Finansy. Menedzhment: aktual'ni pytannja nauky i praktyky. No 3, pp. 86–99.
8. Mazur V.A. (2018). Osoblyvosti kadrovoi' polityky agrarnyh pidpryjemstv u suchasnyh umovah Ekonomika [Features of personnel policy of agricultural enterprises in modern conditions Economy]. Finansy. Menedzhment: aktual'ni pytannja nauky i praktyky. No 1, pp. 7–20.
9. Pimenova O. (2013). Sil's'kogospodars'ka obslugovujucha kooperacija jak chynnyk konkurentnogo gospodarjuvannja malyh i serednih gospodarstv v Ukrai'ni [Agricultural service cooperation as a factor of competitive management of small and medium farms in Ukraine]. Visnyk Kyi'vs'kogo nacional'nogo universytetu im. T. Shevchenka. Ekonomika. Iss. 148, pp. 58–61.
10. Sachuk R.M., Demchuk M.V. (2012). Biznes-plan proektu budivnyctva ta ekspluatacii' pleminnoi' fermy zgidno z vymogamy veterynarnoi' tehnologii' vyroshhuvannja kroliv potuzhnistju na 100 mini-ferm [Business plan of the project of construction and operation of a breeding farm in accordance with the requirements of veterinary technology of rabbit breeding with a capacity of 100 mini-farms]. Rivne. 43 p.
11. Demchak I.M., Bisjuk I.Ju., Mykytjuk D.M., Nechyporuk A.A. (2013). Metodyka rozroblennja normatyvnyh system produktyvnosti na utrymannja ta vyroshhuvannja velykoi' rogatoi' hudoby [Methods of development of normative systems of productivity for keeping and raising cattle]. Kyi'v. 106 p.
12. Demchak I.M., Zavalevs'ka V.O., Gagren' F.O. (2014). Metodyka formuvannja normatyvnyh system produktyvnosti u skotarstvi [Methods of formation of normative systems of productivity in cattle breeding]. Kyi'v: NDI "Ukragropromproduktyvnist' ". 71 p.
13. Dudych L. (2019). Sil's'kogospodars'ka obslugovujucha kooperacija jak perspektyvnyj naprjam rozvytku agrarnoi' ekonomiky [Agricultural service cooperation as a promising area of agricultural economy]. Visnyk L'vivs'kogo nacional'nogo agrarnogo universytetu. Arhitektura i sil's'kogospodars'ke budivnyctvo. No 20, pp. 161–164.
14. Mazurenko O.V. (2016). Promyslove svynarstvo v umovah suchasnogo rynku [Industrial pig breeding in the modern market]. Ekonomika APK. No 8, pp. 27–32.
15. Hirivs'kyj R. (2014). Integrovani holdyngovi struktury u postkryzovyj period funkcionuvannja APK Ukrai'ny [Integrated holding structures in the post-crisis period of functioning of the agro-industrial complex of Ukraine]. Visnyk L'vivs'kogo nacional'nogo agrarnogo universytetu. Serija: Ekonomika APK. No 21(1), pp. 194–199.
16. Diduh S.M. (2020). Agropromyslovi holdyngy v konteksti inkljuzyvnogo rozvytku [Agro-industrial holdings in the context of inclusive development]. Derzhava ta regiony. Serija: Ekonomika ta pidpryjemnyctvo. No 2, pp. 113–116.
17. Zinchuk T.O. (2019). Osoblyvosti funkcionuvannja vertykal'no integrovanyh biznes-struktur holdyngovogo typu v agrarnomu sektori [Features of functioning of vertically integrated business structures of holding type in the agricultural sector]. Ekonomika APK. No 9, pp. 19–30.
18. Mazurenko O.V. (2012). Vprovadzhennja innovacijnyh tehnologij u svynarstvo – osnova jogo intensyvnogo rozvytku [Introduction of innovative technologies in pig breeding is the basis of its intensive development]. Nauk. visn. L'vivs'kogo nacional'nogo universytetu veterynarnoi' medycyny ta biotehnologij im. G'zhyc'kogo. Vol. 14. No 1(1), pp. 435–439.
19. Ibatullin M.I. (2016). Pleminne svynarstvo v Ukrai'ni: suchasnyj stan ta problemy vyrishennja [Breeding pig breeding in Ukraine: current state and problems of solution]. Zb. nauk. prac' Tavrijs'kogo derzhavnogo agrotehnologichnogo universytetu. No 3, pp. 70–76.
20. Dudarenko V.V. (2015). Organizacijno-pravovi formy ta specializacija agrarnyh holdyngiv zakordonom [Organizational and legal forms and specialization of agricultural holdings abroad]. Nauk. visn. Akademii' municypal'nogo upravlinnja. Serija: Pravo. Iss. 1(2), pp. 110–116.
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
 samoilyk_yu._lavruk_v._pokotylska_n._lavruk_o._1-2021.pdf | 913.62 KB |