You are here
Characteristics of factors affecting the sustainable development of agricultural enterprises
The article examines the factors that influence the sustainability of the agricultural enterprise, as well as approaches to determining the vector of their influence on achieving sustainability and developing practical recommendations for strengthening (weakening) their action. It is substantiated that ensuring the stable functioning of agricultural enterprises in conditions of martial law requires the search for new approaches to achieving sustainability. The author’s approach to interpreting the sustainable development of an enterprise involves its stable acquisition of a new quality, which is manifested in a balanced change in subsystems - economic, social, environmental, which ensure the achievement of sustainability based on the use of innovations. It is proven that the condition for achieving sustainability by the agricultural enterprise is the stability of its development, which is considered as a tool for ensuring sustainability. It is concluded that small and medium-sized agricultural enterprises do not have sufficient adaptive capabilities to the conditions of the external environment, which makes it difficult for them to achieve sustainability.
It is argued that the internal factors that influence the achievement of sustainability by the agricultural enterprise, unlike external ones, are subjective and most of them are subject to quantitative assessment. It is argued that the quality of the management process of an agricultural enterprise is one of the factors of the external environment that influences its achievement of sustainability. Indicators of management quality assessment are highlighted, which should be taken into account in the system of the most influential factors on the achievement of sustainability by an enterprise.
The internal social factors that influence the sustainability of an agricultural enterprise include the following: the level of quality of employees life, the level of social security, indicators of staff turnover, the qualitative structure of employees by education, age, etc. The most important environmental indicators for ensuring the sustainability of the agricultural enterprise are highlighted, among which are: compliance with crop rotation, rational use of fertilizers, protection of fields (plantations), maintenance of ecological and landscape systems of agriculture, alternative agricultural production, technologies for the use and disposal of by-products, etc. It is substantiated that the transition of an agricultural enterprise to the principles of sustainable development occurs provided that it achieves sustainable development and economic growth of the main resulting indicators.
Key words: sustainable development, agricultural enterprise, external factors, internal factors, sustainability, models of sustainable development, qualitative economic growth.
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2572-98611. Chynnyky i trendy ekonomichnoho zrostannia v Ukraini: kolektyvna monohrafiia [Factors and trends of economic growth in Ukraine: collective monograph]. Edited by Dr. of Economics M.I. Skrypnychenko; NAS of Ukraine, State Institution «Institute of Economics and Forecasting NAS of Ukraine». Electronic data. K., 2018. 386 p.
2. Varchenko, O., Danylenko, A., Krysanov, D. and others. (2016). Kontseptualni osnovy staloho rozvytku ahrosfery [Conceptual foundations of sustainable development of the agricultural sector]. Bila Tserkva National Agrarian University. Bila Tserkva, 184 p.
3. Porter, M., Kramer, M. (2006). Strategy and Society: The Link between Competitive Advantage and Corporate Social Responsibility. Harvard Business Review, No. 12, p. 84.
4. Prykasyuk, N. (2024). Vprovadzhennia pryntsypiv ESG nebankivskymy finansovymy instytutamy: tendentsii ta perspektyvy. [Implementation of ESG principles by non-banking financial institutions: trends and prospects]. Ekonomika ta suspilstvo [Economy and Society]. Issue (61). Available at: https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2024-61-39
5. KSE. Ohliad zbytkiv ta vtrat v APK Ukrainy [Review of losses and losses in the agricultural sector of Ukraine]. Available at: https://kse.ua/ua/oglyadzbitkiv-ta-vtrat-v-apk/
6. Vytoptova, V. A. (2024). Doslidzhennia stanu ta problem silskoho hospodarstva Ukrainy v umovakh voiennoho chasu [Research on the state and problems of Ukrainian agriculture in wartime]. Ahrarni innovatsii [Agrarian innovations]. No 23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32848/agrar.innov.2024.23.30
7. Nadvodniuk, O. O. (2022). Teoretykometodychni aspekty upravlinnia stalym rozvytkom silskohospodarskykh pidpryiemstv [Theoretical and methodological aspects of managing sustainable138 development of agricultural enterprises]. Ekonomika ta upravlinnia APK [Economics and management of the agricultural complex]. No 2. 124-136 pp. DOI: 10.33245/2310-9262-2022-177-2-124-136
8. Makukh, T., Korobovych, L., & Ruban, V. (2023). Stiikist yak mekhanizm zabezpechennia staloho rozvytku pidpryiemstva [Sustainability as a mechanism for ensuring sustainable development of an enterprise]. Tavriiskyi naukovyi visnyk. Seriia: Ekonomika [Tavria Scientific Bulletin. Series: Economics]. 2023. (18). 122-127 pp. Available at: https://doi.org/10.32782/2708-0366/2023.18.13
9. Khakhaliev, D., Haharinov, O. (2024). Ekonomichna stiikist pidpryiemstva yak osnova staloho rozvytku v umovakh hlobalnykh zmin. [Economic sustainability of the enterprise as a basis for sustainable development in the context of global changes]. Modeling the development of the economic systems. 2024. Vyp. (3). 145–151 pp. Available at: https://doi.org/10.31891/mdes/2024-13-19
10. Varchenko, О., Utechenko, D., Khakhula, L. (2019). Key Components of Sustainable Supply Chain Development of the Agricultural Sector of Ukraine. Int. J Sup. Chain. Mgt. Vol. 8, No 2. 874- 884 рр.
11. Zinchuk, T., Ramanauskasa Yu. (2019). Stalyi rozvytok silskykh terytorii: monohrafiia [Sustainable development of rural areas: monograph]. Kyiv: «Tsentr uchbovoi literatury», 421 p.
12. Rusnak, A. V., Karnaushenko, A. S., Petrenko, V. S. (2018). Strakhuvannia ryzykiv silskohospodarskykh pidpryiemstv v Ukraini [Insurance of risks of agricultural enterprises in Ukraine]. Investytsii: praktyka ta dosvid [Investments: practice and experience]. No. 19. 5-10 pp. DOI: 10.32702/2306-6814.2018.19.5
13. Kabinet ministriv Ukrainy [Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine]. Rozporiadzhennia «Pro skhvalennia Stratehii zaprovadzhennia pidpryiemstvamy zvitnosti iz staloho rozvytku» vid18.10.2024. [Order "On approval of the Strategy for the introduction of sustainable development reporting by enterprises" dated October 18, 2024 №1015- r.]. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/ show/1015-2024-%D1%80#Text
14. Varchenko, O.M. (2021). Optymizatsiia struktury kapitalu yak instrument upravlinnia vartistiu
molokopererobnykh pidpryiemstv [Optimization of the capital structure as a tool for managing the value of milk processing enterprises]. Ekonomika ta upravlinnia APK [Economics and Management of the Agricultural Industry]. No 1. 111–124 pp. Available at: https://doi.org/10.332451/2310-9262-2021-162- 1-111-124
15. Melnyk, A. O., Vabyshchevich, I. S. (2020). Orhanizatsiia systemy efektyvnoho vnutrishnoho kontroliu na pidpryiemstvi [Organization of an effective internal control system at an enterprise]. Efektyvna ekonomika [Effective economy]. No. 11.DOI: https://doi.org/10.32702/2307-2105-2020.11.5
16. Bardash, S. (2023). Finansova stabilnist ta yii znachennia dlia rozvytku pdpryiemstva [Financial stability and its importance for the development of an enterprise]. Scientific Collection «InterConf». 99–
103 pp. Available at: https://archive.interconf.center/ index.php/conference-proceeding/article/view/2487
17. Chepka, V. V., Matiash, O. K. (2017). Finansova stiikist pidpryiemstva: sutnist ta faktory vplyvu [Financial stability of an enterprise: essence and factors of influence]. Ekonomika i suspilstvo [Economy and society]. No. 12. 649–655 pp.
18. Hmyrya, V., Polyakh, S. (2023). Zabezpechennia ekonomichnoho zrostannia pidpryiemstv u postindustrialnii ekonomitsi [Ensuring economic growth of enterprises in a post-industrial economy]. Ekonomika ta suspilstvo [Economy and society]. (54). Available at: https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-
0072/2023-54-50
19. Kurman, T. (2018). Stalyi rozvytok silskohospodarskoho vyrobnytstva: problemy pravovoho zabezpechennia: monohrafiia [Sustainable development of agricultural production: problems of legal support: monograph]. Kharkiv. 376 p.
20. Lopatynskyi, Yu. M., Todoryuk, S.I. (2015). Determinanty staloho rozvytku ahrarnykh pidpryiemstv: monohrafiia [Determinants of sustainable development of agricultural enterprises: monograph]. Chernivtsi National University, 220 p.
21. Varchenko, O., Svynous, I., Krisanov, D. and at. (2018). Sustainability and competitiveness principles of agro-food chains in Ukraine. International Journal of Management and Business Research. Vol. 8 (1). 160-172 рр.
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
 nadvodnyuk_129-139.pdf | 566.3 KB |