You are here
Scientific foundations of the infrastructure system research of rural areas
The article systematizes the scientific principles of research into the infrastructure system of rural areas.
The purpose of the article is to generalize the theoretical foundations of the infrastructure systems study of rural areas based on the provisions of systemic, evolutionary, structural-functional, spatial approaches, principles study of sustainable development, strategic management and substantiation of the methodological foundations for studying the specifics of the rural areas infrastructure.
The most common approaches to the definition of the concept of «infrastructure» are identified: service, in which infrastructure is considered as the basis of public service, production activity, etc.; reproductive - infrastructure is the basis for reproduction of goods, services, life activities, etc.; complex - infrastructure as a complex of objects; systemic - infrastructure as a system, a set of objects interconnected with each other and the external environment; spatial - infrastructure as the forming basis of the region, local territory.
It has been established that in modern research, infrastructure is considered as a system-wide concept, an approach to its understanding is being formed as a separate integral system, as well as a subsystem of the second order, in particular, spatial, socio-economic. Itis argued that the spatial approach to the understanding of infrastructure has become the most widespread in the research of the infrastructure of rural areas.
It is substantiated that spatial studies of infrastructure involve considering it not only as a service system, but also as a means of development, a communication connecting platform for territories, the full functioning of which determines the systemic effects of branch and regional components of spatial formations, socio-economic systems. The theoretical aspects of the regional infrastructure concept which are based on an interdisciplinary approach, based on a combination of key provisions of the regional and spatial economics theory, systems theory, evolutionary economics, and infrastructure theory, have been supplemented.
The definition of the «infrastructural system of arural area» concept is proposed as a dynamic complementary structure that forms and transforms the spatial basis of socio-economic activity at the area rural level, ensures the development of interconnected, interacting systems, elements, objects of various territories hierarchical levels based on mutual complementarity.
Key words: infrastructure, infrastructure system, rural areas, spatial economy, evolutionary economy, system approach, infrastructure theories.
REFERENCES
1. Talavirya, M., Kosach, I. (2023). Suchasni aspekti rozvitku infrastrukturi silskih teritorij [Modern aspects of rural infrastructure development]. Problema i perspektivi ekonomiki ta upravlinnya [The problem and prospects of economics and management].2023. Issue 2 (30). P. 85-92. Available at: https://doi.org/10.25140/2411-5215-2022-2(30)-85-92
2. Popelo, O. V. (2023). Suchasni tendenciyi infrastrukturnogo rozvitku silskih teritorij na derzhavnomurivni [Modern trends of infrastructural development of rural areas at the state level]. Naukovij visnik Uzhgorodskogo universitetu [Scientific Bulletin of Uzhhorod University]. No. 1. (61).
3. Danilenko, A. S., Varchenko, O. M., Krisanov, D. F. ets. (2020). Silskij sektor Kiyivskoyi oblasti v umovah suspilnih transformacij: kolektivna monografiya [The rural sector of the Kyiv region in the conditions of social transformations: a collective monograph]. Bila Tserkva: BNAU. 310 p.
4. Petretsky, I. I. (2022). Potencial rozvitku silskih teritorij v umovah decentralizaciyi [Development potential of rural areas in conditions of decentralization]. Scientific Bulletin of Uzhhorod University. No. 1 (59). Available at: https://doi.org/10.24144/2409- 6857.2022.1(59).41-46 p.
5. Danylenko, A. S. (2021). Metodologichni zasadi prioritetnih napryamiv naukovih doslidzhen u agrarnij ekonomici Ukrayini [Methodological principles of priority areas of scientific research in the agrarian economy of Ukraine]. Economics and management of agriculture. No. 1. P. 50–64. Available at: https://doi. org/10.33245/2310-9262-2021-162-1-50-62
6. Dudziak, O. A. (2018). Zagalna metodologiya doslidzhennya rozvitku silskih teritorij [General methodology for the study of the development of rural areas]. Innovative economy. No. 3-4. P. 75-79.
7. Samelson, P., Nordnaus, W. Economics. Available at: https://moodle.estgv.ipv.pt/201920/pluginfile. php/59329/mod_resource/content/1/samunord19.pdf
8. Hansen, N. (1970). Criteria for a growth center policy. Conference on growth poles hypotheses and policies, papers. Madrid. Р. 12–24.
9. Hirschman, A. O. (1958). Strategy of economic development. New Haven: Yale University Press. 230 p.
10. Nurkse, R. (1958). Problems of capital formation in underdeveloped countries. New York: Oxford University Press. 163 р.
11. Rostow, W. (1963). The economics of take-off into sustained growth. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 482 p.
12. Smith, A. (2018). Bagatstvo narodiv. Doslidzhennya pro prirodu ta prichini dobrobutu nacij: pereklad Oleksandra Vasilyeva [The wealth of nations. Research on the nature and causes of the well-beingof nations: translated by Oleksandr Vasiliev]. K.: Nash Format. 722 p.
13. Marx, K. (1965). Kapital. Kritika politichnoyi ekonomiyi [Capital. Criticism of political economy]. Volume 3. Book 2. Complete collection of works: in 50 volumes: trans. from Russian Kyiv: Publishing House of Political Literature of Ukraine, 1965. Vol. 25. Part 2. 511 p.
14. Rosenstein-Rodan, P. N. (1961). Notes on the theory of the «Big Push». Economic development for Latin America: proceedings of a conference held by the international economic association: ed. by H. S. Ellisю H. C. Wallich. London: Macmillan. P. 57–81.
15. Jochimsen, R. (1966). Theorie der Infrastruktur: Grundlagen der marktwirtschaftlichen Entwicklung. Tübingen: Universität Tübingen. 253 р.
16. Singer, H. (1964). International development: growth and change. New York: McGraw-Hill. 295 p.
17. Clark, J. M. (1923). Studies in the economic of overhead costs. Chicago: LВВ. 515 pр.
18. Coase, R. (1937). The Nature of the Firm. Economica, New Series, Vol. 4, No. 16. Р. 386-405. Available at: https://www.scribd.com/document/341564476/ The-Nature-of-the-Firm-Ronald-Coase
19. Nurkse, R. (1958). Problems of capital formation in under developed countries. New York: Oxford University Press. 163 р.
20 Hirschman, A. O. (1958). Strategy of economicdevelopment. New Haven: Yale University Press. 230 p.
21. Gukalova, I. V., Omelchenko, N. V. (2015). Visnik ONU [Bulletin of ONU]. Ser.: Geographical and geological sciences. Vol. 20, issue 2. Available at: https://journals.indexcopernicus.com/api/file/ viewByFileId/394992.pdf
22. Youngson, A. (1967). Overhead Capital Study Development Economics. 1st ed. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. 192 p.
23. Pesenti, A. (1970). Manuale di economia politica. Vol. primo. Roma: Editori Riuniti Nuova Biblioteca di Cultura. 652 p.
24. Nurkse, R. (1966). Problems of Capital Formation in Underdeveloped Countries. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 163 p.
25. Aschauer, D. A. (1989). Is Public Expenditure Productive? Journal of Monetary Economics. Vol. 23. No. 2. P. 177-200. Available at: https://doi. org/10.1016/0304-3932(89)90047-0
26. Vasiliev, O. V. (2007). Metodologiya i praktika infrastrukturnogo zabezpechennya funkcionuvannya i rozvitku regioniv Ukrayini: monografiya [Methodology and practice of infrastructural support for the functioning and development of the regions of Ukraine: monograph]. Kharkiv: KhNAMG. 341 p.
27. Seryogina-Berestovska, O. V. (2019). Derzhavne regulyuvannya rozvitku silskoyi socialnoyi infrastrukturi [State regulation of rural social infrastructure development]. Kvalifikacijna naukova pracya na pravah rukopisu [Qualifying scientific work on manuscript rights]. Kharkiv. P. 21-22.
28. Trushkina, N. (2023). Evolyuciya teoretichnih poglyadiv na sutnist ponyattya infrastruktura [Evolution of theoretical views on the essence of the concept of infrastructure]. International interdisciplinary journal. Science and perspective. No. 3 (22). Available at: https:// doi.org/10.52058/2695-1592-2023-3(22)-125-143
29. Melnyk, A., Shimko, I. (2020). Infrastruktura administrativnogo rajonu v umovah sektoralnih i administrativno-teritorialnoyi reform [Infrastructure of the administrative district in the conditions of sectoral and administrative-territorial reforms]. Regional aspects of the development of productive forces of Ukraine. Issue 25. P.31-41. DOI: https://doi. org/10.35774/rarrpsu2020.25.031
30. Dubnytskyi, V. I., Fedulova, S. O., Vasylyuk, O. V. (2017). Regionalna infrastruktura: modernizaciya, prioriteti ta perspektivi rozvitku [Regional infrastructure: modernization, priorities and development prospects]. Problemi ekonomiki [Problems of the economy]. No. 2. P. 161-166.
31. Friedmann, J. (1966). Regional developmentpolicy: a case study of Venezuela. Cambridge: MIT Press. 279 р.
32. Boudeville, J. (1961). Les espaces économiques. Paris: Presses universitaires de France. 128 р.
33. Perrou, F. (1961). L'économie du XXe siècle. Paris: Presses universitaires de France. 610 р.
34. Pottier, P. (1963). Axes de communication et développement économique. Révue économique. Vol.14, no. 1. Р. 58-132.
35. Weber, A. (1922). Standort der Industrien. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck). 268 р.
36. Christaller, W. (1980). Die zentralen Orte in Süddeutschland. Eine ökonomisch-geographische Unter-suchung über die Gesetzmäßigkeit der Verbreitung undEntwicklung der Siedlungen mit städtischer Funktionen. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft. 331 р.
37. Launhardt, W. (1882). Die Bestimmung des zweckmässigsten Standortes einer gewerblichen Anlage. Zeitschrift des Vereines deutscher Ingenieure. Vol. 26. Р. 106-115.
38. Park, R. E. (1925). The city. Chicago, Illinois: The University of Chicago Press. 240 р.
39. Hoyt, H. (1939). The Structure and Growth of Residential Neighborhoods in American Cities. Washington DC: Federal Housing Administration. 178 р.
40. Hilgers, M., Mangez, É. (2015). Bourdieu's Theory of Social Fields: Concepts and Applications. Routledge. Available at: https://doi. org/10.4324/9781315772493
41. Castells, M. (2010). The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture Volume 1: The Rise of the Network Society. 2nd ed. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell. Available at: https://urb.bme.hu/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/manuel_castells_the_rise_of_the_network_societybookfi org.compressed.pdf
42. Giddens, E. (1984). The Structure of Society: An Essay on Structure Theory. United State by the California Press. Available at: https://books.google.com. ua/books?id=x2bf4g9Z6ZwC&printsec=frontcover&hl=ru#v=onepage&q&f=false
43. Yemelyanova, Yu. (2018). Ponyattya lyudskogo potencialu u konteksti transformacijnih procesiv v Ukrayini [The concept of human potential in the context of transformational processes in Ukraine]. Sociological studies. 1(12), pp. 12-18. DOI: https://doi. org/10.29038/2306-3971-2018-01-12-18
44. Dufo, F. (2011). Znachushist ta neodnoznachnosti ekonomichnoyi sociologiyi Burdye: per. z fr. O. Kuchma [Significance and ambiguities of Bourdieu's economic sociology: trans. from Fr. O. Kuchma]. Available at: https://commons.com.ua/en/sotsialni-strukturi-ekonomiki/
45. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston: Harpercollins College Div, January. 275 p.
46. Porter, M. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. New York: Free Press. 855 рр.
47. Krugman, P. (1993). First Nature, Second Nature and Metropolitan Location. Journal of Regional Science. Vol. 33:2. Р. 129–144.
48. McCombie, J. (2002). Productivity Growth and Economic Growth: Essays on Verdoorn’s Law, Editor (with M Pugno and B Soro), Houndm ills: Palgrave.
49. Wozniak, G. V. (2015). Suchasni teoriyi ta paradigmi regionalnogo rozvitku: praktichnij vimir dlya Ukrayini [Modern theories and paradigms of regional development: practical dimension for Ukraine]. Globalni ta nacionalni problemi ekonomiki. Mikolayivskij nacionalnij universitet imeni V.O. Suhomlinskogo [Global and national economic problems. Mykolaiv National University named V.O. Sukhomlynskyi]. Issue 5. P. 671-677. Available at: http://global-national. in.ua/archive/5-2015/138.pdf
50. Sustainable Development Goals: Ukraine: national report. Available at: https://www.kmu. gov.ua/storage/app/sites/1/natsionalna-dopovid-csr-Ukrainy.pdf
51. Luhmann, N. (1997). Theory of society. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
52. Bazhal, Yu. (1993). Evolyucijna paradigm ekonomiki perehidnogo periodu [The evolutionary paradigm of the economy of the transition period]. Economy of Ukraine. No. 8. P. 3-11. Available at: https://core. ac.uk/download/pdf/149235851.pdf
53. Bertalanffy, L. (1968). General system theory: foundations, development, applications. New York: G.Braziller, 1968. 289 p.
54. Nedbalyuk, O. P., Demyanyshina, O. A. (2020). Sistemnij pidhid do formuvannya suchasnoyi infrastrukturi upravlinnya rozvitkom teritorialnih gromad [Systematic approach to the formation of modern infrastructure for managing the development of territorial communities]. Electronic edition: Public administration: improvement and development. 2020, No. 8. Available at: https://doi.org/10.32702/2307-2156-2020.8.51,
55. Kotelevets, D. A. (2022). Sistemnij pidhid do piznannya sutnosti do piznannya sutnosti derzhavnogo
regulyuvannya infrastrukturi cifrovoyi ekonomiki [Systematic approach to understanding the essence of state regulation of the infrastructure of the digital economy]. Problems and prospects of economics and management. 2022. No. 4 (28). P. 35-42. Available at: https://doi. org/10.25140/2411-5215-2021-4(28)-35-42
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
 holovashenko_1_2024_43-58.pdf | 912.2 KB |