You are here
Theoretical principles and practical approaches to the relations regulation between the participants of the meat supply chain
The article is studies theoretical principles and practical approaches to the settlement of relations between the food chain participants in the meat market. The issues of formation and transformation of food chains are currently one of the most discussed and studied by foreign and domestic scientists. It is substantiated that the share of direct producers of beef and pork has a negative dynamics of reduction and fluctuates within 30-40% in the fnal price formation. The share of producers in the retail price of poultry meat is much higher (47.1-59.5%) due to vertical integration and a closed production cycle. It is proved that the inconsistency of economic relations between the participants of the "production - processing - trade - the meat market consumer" chain affects both the supply of meat processing plants with raw materials and the formation of prices that would satisfy all the participants and results in unsatisfactory price situation for meat. Generalization of theoretical, methodological and practical principles of the "production-processing-trade-consumption" food chain, analysis and evaluation of the role of each of the links and studying the international experience gives grounds for identifying a number of areas in regulation of the relations and predetermine the increase the producer share in the chain through concluding fair and effective agreements between meat market participants; creation of agricultural service cooperatives and other associations of producers; establishment and running a network of wholesale markets for agricultural products; support for the creation and development of short supply chains; development of innovative logistics approaches and methods based on modern digital technologies. It is established that the relations between the participants of the chain "production-processing-trademeat market consumption" should be based on the principles of trust, justice, mutual respect, corporate social responsibility. It is substantiated that changes in consumer demands for food, including meat, increased competition, changes in government regulation, technological advances, increased emphasis on efciency and sustainability, food safety affect changes in business and competitiveness strategies, which ultimately cause transformations in food chains in the form of new and innovative logistics approaches and methods.
Key words: meat market, food chain, price, relationship settlement, innovative logistics approaches.
1.Vermesan O., Friess P., Guillemin P., Serrano M., Bouraoui M., Freire L.P., Kallstenius T., Lam K., Eisenhaure M., Moessner K., etal. (2016). IT digital value chain connecting research, innovation and deployment. In Digitising the Industry: Internet of Things Connecting the Physical, Digitaland Virtual Words. River Publishers Seriesin Communications, 49; River Publishers: Gistrup, Denmark.
2. Nikishyna O.V. (2021).Tax regulation of flow processes in the chain of the Ukrainian market of grain and bread products. Economics: timerealities. Scientifcjournal. No. 1 (53), pp. 5-13. DOI: 10.15276/ ETR.01.2021.10.
3. Kopytec, N.H., Voloshyn, V.M. (2020). Suchasnyi stan ta tendentsii rynku miasa [Current state and trends of the meat market]. Ekonomika APK [Ekonomika APK]. No. 6, pp. 59–68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32317/2221-1055.202006059.
4. Udo H.M.J., etal. (2011). Impact of intensifcation of various livestock production in small-scale livestock systems. Livestock. No. 139. pp. 22-29. DOI: 10.1016/j.livsci.2011.03.020.
5. Lupenko Yu.O., KopytetsN.Hr., Voloshyn V.M. (2021). Structuralchangesinthemeatmarket. BIO WebConferences.Vol. 36, 08006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/20213608006.
6. Forsman S., Paananen J. (2001). Local food supply chain: a case of rural food processing frms and catering business in Finland. Urban areas rural areas and recycling the organic way forward? Proceedings from NJF seminar. No 327, pp. 71-80.
7. Kullapapruk Piewthongngam, Prasert Vijitnopparat, Supachai Pathumnakul, Sawvapark Chumpatong, Monchai Duangjinda. System dynamics modelling of an integrated pig production supply chain. Biosystems Engineering. 2014. Vol. 127, pp. 24-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2014.08.007.
8. Perez C., deCastro R. andFont i Furnols M. (2009). The pork industry: a supply chain perspective. British Food Journal. Vol. 111. No. 3, pp. 257-274. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/00070700910941462.
9. Ahumada O. And Villalobos J.R. (2009). Application of planning models in the agri-food supply chain: a review. European Journal of Operational Research. Vol. 196. No. 1, pp. 1-20.
10. Joao G. M. DosReis, Sivanilza T. Machado, Rodrigo C. Santos, IrenilzaDe A. Naas, Rone V. Oliveira. (2015). Financial losses in pork supply chain: a study of the pre-slaughter handling impacts. Eng. agríc. No. 35 (1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-4430-Eng.Agric.v35n1p163-170/2015.
11. Man Mohan Siddh, Gunjan Soni, Rakesh Jain, Milind Kumar Sharma, Vinod Yadav. (2017). Agrifresh food supply chain quality: a literaturere view. Industrial Management & Data Systems. Vol. 117.Iss. 9, pp.2015-2044. DOI:10.1108/IMDS-10-2016-0427.
12. Birgit Schulze-Ehlers and SvenAnders. (2018). Towards consumer-driven mea tsupply chains: opportunities and challenges for differentiation by taste. Agriculture and Food Systems. February. Vol. 33. Special Issue 1: Value Chain Development and Impacts. pp. 73- 85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742170517000059.
13. Markou M., Stylianou A., Marianthi G., Adamides G. (2020). Identifyingbusiness-to-businessunfairtradingpracticesinthefoodsupplychain: thecaseofCyprus. NewMedit. No. 19(1), pp. 19-34.
14. Mutonyi S., Beukel K., Gyau A., Hjortso C.N. (2016). Price satisfaction and producer loyalty.The roleo fme diator sin business to business relation ships in Kenyan mango supply chain. British Food Journal. No. 118(5), pp. 1067-1084.
15. Meena S., Meena S. D., PratapSaurabh, Patidar R., Daultani Y.(2019). Strategic analysis of the Indianagri-food supply chain. Business. No. 1. DOI:10.1007/S12597-019-00380-5.
16. Borodina O.M. (2014) . Intehratsiia dribnykh silskohospodarskykh vyrobnykiv do ahroprodovolchykh lantsiuhiv dodanoi vartosti: metodolohichni pidkhody ta empirychni doslidzhennia [Integration of small agricultural producers into agri-food valuechains: methodological approaches and empirical research]. Ekonomika i prohnozuvannia [Economicsandforecasting]. No. 2. Pp, 73-83.
17. Varchenko O.O. (2021). Osoblyvosti formuvannia ahroprodovolchykh lantsiuhiv na zovnishnikh rynkakh [Features of the formation of agri-food chains in foreign markets]. Eknomika t aupravlinnia APK [Economics and management of agro-industrial complex]. No. 1, pp. 14-27.
18. Nosratabadi S., Mosavi A., Lakner Z. (2020). Food Supply Chainand Business Model Innovation. Foods. No. 9(2). DOI: 10.3390/foods9020132.
19. Čechura L., Šobrová L. (2008). The price transmission in pork meat agri-food chain. Agric. Econ. Czech. No. 54, pp. 77-84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17221/272-AGRICECON.
20. Lechanová I. (2006). The transmission process of supply and demand shocks in Czech meat commodity chain. Agric. Econ. Czech. No. 52, pp. 427-435. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17221/5046-AGRICECON.
21. Shpychak O.M. (2015). Ekonomiko-orhanizatsiini neuzghodzhenosti vzaiemovidnosyn u produktovykh lantsiuhakh v umovakh infliatsiino-devalvatsiinykh protsesiv: napriamyv rehuliuvannia [Economic and organizational inconsistencies of relations in food chains in the conditions of inflation-devaluation processes: directions of settlement]. Ekonomika APK [Ekonomika APK]. No. 6, pp. 85-95.
22. Shpychak O.M., LupenkoYu.O., Bondar O.V. tain. (2020). Metodychni polozhennia shchodo funktsionuvannia systemy ekonomichnykh vazheliv pidvyshchennia spozhyvchoi vartosti silskohospodarskoi produktsii ta prodovolstva [Methodical provisions on the function in gofthe system of economic levers to increase the consumer value of agricultural products and food]. K.: NNTs «IAE».
23. Bodnar O. V., Kozak O. A., Kopytec N. H. (2014). Napriamy vrehuliuvannia vzaiemovidnosyn vyrobnykiv, prodavtsiv i spozhyvachiv sotsialno-znachymykh produktiv kharchuvannia [Directions for regulating the relationship between producers, sellers and consumers of socially signifcant food products]. Ekonomika APK [Ekonomika APK]. No. 2, pp. 42–50.
24. Lupenko Yu.O., Shpychak O.M., Pashko S.O. ta in. Metodychni rekomendatsii shchodo otsinky tsinovykh prodovolchykh lantsiuhiv [Methodical recommendations for the assessment of food price chains.]. K. : NNTs «IAE», 2021.
25. Hladii M. V., Sabluk P. T., Kopytec N. H. tain. (2012). Rozvytok miasoproduktovoho pidkompleksu Ukrainy: monohrafia [Development of the meatproduct subcomplex of Ukraine: monograph]. K. : NNTs IAE.
26. Kopytec N.H. (2020). Analizt sinovoi sytuatsii na rynku miasa velykoi rohatoi khudoby [Analysis of the price situation in the beefmarket]. Ekonomika APK [Ekonomika APK]. No. 11. pp. 52-60.DOI: https://doi.org/10.32317/2221-1055.202011060
27. Kopytec N.H., Svynous I.V. (2008). Intehratsiini zviazky osobystykhs elianskykh hospodarstv z pererobnymy pidpryiemstvamy v umovakh formuvannia rynkovykh vidnosyn [Integration relations of personal peasant farms with processing enterprises in the conditions of formation of market relations]. Visnyk Khmelnytskoho natsionalnoho universytetu. Ekonomichni nauky [Bulletin of Khmelnytsky National University. Economic sciences]. T. 1, pp. 125-128.
28. Directive (EU) 2019/633 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 April 2019 on unfair trading practices in business-to-business relationships in the agricultural and food supply chain. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32019L0633&q...
29. Dymne miaso vid Tarasa [Smoked meat from Taras]. Availableat: https://dymne.com.ua/delivery
30. Ivasiuk P. V Ukraini vzhe pratsiuie 70 «Miasomarketiv» MKhP [There arealready 70 MHP Meat Markets in Ukraine]. Availableat: https://www.ukrinform.ua/rubric-economy/3258943-v-ukraini-vze-pracue-70-...
31. Kozak O.A., Malik L.M. (2012). Formuvannia mizhhaluzevykh vidnosyn ta ekvivalentnist obminu v ahrarnii sferi [Formation of intersectoral relations and equivalence of exchangein the agricultural sector]. Ekonomika APK [Ekonomika APK]. No. 8, pp.17-21.
32. Yatsiv I., Yatsiv S. (2015). Formuvannia tsin na silskohospodarsku produktsiiu yak chynnyk rozvytku ahrarnoho sektoru ekonomiky [Formation of prices for agricultural products as a factor in the development of the agricultural sector of the economy]. Ahrarnaekonomika [Agrarianeconomy]. T. 8, No. 1-2, pp. 24-31.
33. Ahrarna polityka dlia selianskykh fermerskykh hospodarstv ta yikh obiednan: svitovyi dosvid dlia Ukrainy: monohrafia [Agrarian policy for peasant farms and their associations: world experience for Ukraine: monograph] (2021). Zared. O.M. Borodinoi. K. : DU «In-t ekon. taprohnozuv. NAN Ukrainy.
34. Na optovykh rynkakh mozhna pobachyty realnu tsinu na silskohospodarsku produktsiiu [In the wholesale markets you can see the real price of agricultural products]. Availableat: http://minagro.gov.ua/ uk/node/9665.
35. Kneafsey M., Venn L., Schmutz U., Balazs B., Trenchard L., Eyden-Wood T., Bos. E., Sutton G., Blackett M. (2013). Short Food Supply Chains and Local Food Systemsinthe EU. A State of Play of Their Socio-Economic Characteristics. Joint Research Center: Seville, Spain. Availableat: http://ipts.jrc.ec.europa.eu/publications/pub.cfm?id¼6279.
36. Fondse M. (2012). Grown Closeto Home: A Typology of Short Food Supply Chain Business Models in The Netherlands. Master’s Thesis. Wageningen. The Netherlands.
37. Markou M., Stylianou A., Marianthi G., Adamides G. (2020). Identifying business-to-business un fair trading practices in the food supply chain: the case of Cyprus. New Medit. No. 19(1), pp. 19-34.
38. Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 on support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fundfor Rural Development (EAFRD) and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005. Availableat: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A02013R1305-2...
39. Cowley Cortney. (2020). COVID-19 Disruptionsin the US Meat Supply Chain. Main Street Views. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City. Availableat: https://www.kansascityfed.org/agriculture/ag-outlooks/COVID-19-US-Meat-S....
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
kopitec_1_2022.pdf | 551.63 KB |