You are here
Theoretical and methodological aspects of sustainable development management of agricultural enterprises
The article systematizes theoretical and methodological approaches to managing the sustainable development of agricultural enterprises and substantiates the need to form a new management model, the main goal of which is the creation of values. It is highlighted that the sustainable development of the enterprise can be defined as its ability to maintain competitiveness, profitability or break-even based on making effective management decisions. It is argued that the management of the sustainable development of the enterprise is a purposeful development that ensures the emergence of new opportunities for positive changes at the macro level in the aspect of sustainable development of the economy, ecology and society. It has been proven that the management of the sustainable development of the enterprise should be oriented towards meeting the needs of interested parties in order to achieve economic, social and environmental goals in the long term. It is proposed to consider the concept of managing the sustainable development of an agricultural enterprise as an abstract model designed to characterize organizational and economic relations formed in society at various levels of the economic system, in the process of interaction of interested parties to achieve the goals of long-term development. It is substantiated that with such an approach to the definition of managing the sustainable development of rural enterprise, due to the rational use of production resources, it will contribute to obtaining a high amount of added value, which is distributed within the social strata of the population, ensuring the balance of all spheres of the internal and external environment in terms of coordinating the interests of stakeholders in the early period. The main approaches to managing the sustainable development of the enterprise from the standpoint of the concept of corporate social responsibility have been supplemented, and the social, environmental, and economic aspects of management based on the principles of corporate social responsibility have been highlighted, which will allow the corporate structure to have a multiplier effect. It is indicated that the economic effect at the level of an agricultural enterprise is provided by its ability to create conditions for increasing economic indicators and the purchasing power of the rural population; social - the ability to ensure the improvement of the welfare of the rural population and workers (safety, health care, education), optimal distribution within social strata; ecological - the ability to preserve the main functions of the environment over a long period of time in the aspect of resource provision, waste collection and their use.
Key words: sustainable development, social corporate responsibility, management of sustainable development, agricultural enterprise.
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2572-9861
1. Mbow, C. and etc. Food Security, in: Climate Change and Land: an IPCC special report on climate change, desertification, land degradation, sustainable land management, food security, and greenhouse gas fluxes in terrestrial ecosystems. 2019. Available at: https://www.ipcc.ch/srccl (Accessed 15 March 2022).
2. Smith, P. and etc. Agriculture, forestry and other land use (AFOLU), in Working Group III contribution to the IPCC 5th Assessment Report, Climate Change. Mitigation of Climate Change. Cambridge University Press. 2014. Available at: https://www.ipcc.ch/site/ assets/uploads/2018/02/ipcc_wg3_ar5_chapter11.pdf (Accessed 12 July 2022).
3. FAO. FAOSTAT Emissions Totals. Available at: https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#search/Emission (Accessed 25 July 2022).
4. Gütschow, J., Jeffery, L., Gieseke, R. The PRIMAP-hist national historical emissions time series. 2019, vol. 2.3, рр. 1850-2017. Available at:https://doi. org/10.5880/pik.2019.001 (Accessed 15 March 2022).
5. Saunois, M. and etc. The Global Methane Budget 2000–2017, Earth Syst. Sci. 2020, pp.1561– 1623. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-121561-2020. (Accessed 12 July 2022).
6. Crippa, M., Guizzardi, D., Solazzo, E., FerrarioMonforti, F., Tubiello, F. N., Leip, A.: EDGAR-FOOD emission data, figshare. Available at: https://doi. org/10.6084/m9.figshare.13476666 (Accessed 12 July 2022).
7. Tubiello, F. N., Karl, K., Flammini, A., Conchedda, G., Obli-Laryea, G. Food Systems Emissions Shares, Zenodo. рр. 1990–2019, Available at: https://doi10.5281/zenodo.5615082 (Accessed 12 July 2022).
8. Varchenko, O. M., Kalchenko, S. V., Svinous, I. V. and others. (2020). Socialno-ekonomichni aspekty stanovlennja postindustrialnoho suspilstva [Socioeconomic aspects of the formation of post-industrial society]. Bila Tserkva, 302 p.
9. Dyllick, Th. Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment. 2002, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 130-141. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.323 (Accessed 12 July 2022).
10. Elkington, J. Enter the Triple Bottom Line. The Triple Bottom Line: Does it All Add Up? Assessing the Sustainability of Business and CSR. 2004, vol. 1,
pp. 1-16.
11. Steurer R. Corporations, Stakeholders and Sustainable Development: A Theoretical Exploration of Business Society Relations. Journal of Business Ethics. 2005, vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 263-281.
12. Varchenko, O.M. Skladovi ekonomichnoho mechanizmu staloho rozvytku silskoho hospodarstva [Components of the economic mechanism of sustainable development of agriculture]. Ekonomika ta upravlinnja APK [Economy and management of agriculture]. 2012, iss. 8 (95), p. 5-10.
13. Voronko-Nevidnycha, T., Koval, O., Koloda, O. Upravlinnja rozvytkom pidpryjemstva jak neobxidna umova dosjahnennja cilej staloho rozvytku [Enterprise development management as a necessary condition for achieving the goals of sustainable development]. Ekonomika ta suspilstvo [Economy and society]. 2021, iss. 25. Available at: https://doi.org/10.32782/25240072/2021-25-80 (Accessed 12 July 2022).
14. Pakulin, S. L., Pakulina, A. A. Upravlinnja stalym rozvytkom suchasnoho pidpryjemstva. [Management of sustainable development of a modern enterprise]. Trajektorija nauky [The trajectory of science]. 2016, no. 3 (8). Available at: http://pathofscience.org/ index.php/ps/article/view/50 (Accessed 13 July 2022).
15. Elkington, J. Towards the Sustainable Corporation: Win-Win-Win Business Strategies for Sustainable Development. California Management Review. 1994, vol. 6, pp. 90-100.
16. Samoilik, Yu. V. Osoblyvosti upravlinnja stalym rozvytkom silskohospodarskych pidpryjemstv u hlobalnomu seredovyschi. [Peculiarities of managing the sustainable development of agricultural enterprises in a global environment]. Ekonomika i orhanizacija upravlinnja. [Economics and management organization] 2016, no. 4, pp. 237-244.
17. Nyv, H., Deming, E. (2007). Orhanyzacyja kak systema: Prynsypu postroenyja ustoychivogo byznesa [Organization as a system: Principles of building a sustainable business]. Alpyna Byznes Buks [Alpina Business Books]. 370 p.
18. Tchaikovsky, I. A. Mexanizmy zabezpechennja staloho rozvytku silskohospodarskych pidpryjemstv [Mechanisms for ensuring the sustainable development of agricultural enterprises]. Innovacijna ekonomika [Innovative economy]. 2014, no. 6, pp. 108-114.
19. Pylypenko, S. M. Stratehichne upravlinnja pidpryjemstvom na zasadax koncepciji staloho rozvytku [Strategic management of an enterprise based on the concept of sustainable development]. Ekonomika ta suspilstvo [Economy and society]. 2020, iss. 21, pp. 79-85. Available at: https://doi.org/10.32782/25240072/2019-20-47 (Accessed 13 July 2022).
20. Giovanna, C. M. A taxonomy of sustainability topics: a guide to set the corporate sustainability content on the web. TQM journal. 2021, vol. 33, iss. 7, pp. 106-130. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM06-2020-0134 (Accessed 13 July 2022).
21. Drucker, P. F. (1994). Upravlenye, nacelennoe na rezultaty [Results-oriented management]. Texnolohycheskaja schkola byznesa [Technological school of business]. 191 p.
22. Golyan, V. A. Plata za pryrodni resursy v umovax decentralizaciji: investycijnyj aspekt [Payment for natural resources in conditions of decentralization: investment aspect]. Investyciji: praktyka ta dosvid [Investments: practice and experience]. 2016, no. 7,
pp. 7-16.
23. Varchenko, O. M., Utechenko, D. M., Khakhula, L. Р. and other. Key components of sustainable development of the agricultural sector of Ukraine International jornal of Supply Chain Management. 2019, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 874-884. 24. Sachs, J. (2015). The Age of Sustainable Development. Columbia University Press. 544 p.
25. Donald, T., Preston, L. (1995). The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence and Implications. Academy of Management Review,
pp. 66-67. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/258887 (Accessed 14 July 2022).
26. Post, J. E., Preston, L. E., Sachs, S. Managing the extended enterprise: The new stakeholder view. California Management Review. 2002, vol. 45(1).
pp. 6-28.
27. Mendelow, A. L. (1981). Environmental scanning the impact of the stakeholder concept. International conference on information systems. Available at: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/3579/ ca37344c69961bbc2468ef9addf212200e39.pdf (Accessed 03 February 2022).
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
 nadvodniuk_o._2-2022.pdf | 694.65 KB |