You are here

The role and place of income from pf in the formation of the budget of agricultural households of ukraine

 
The role and place of personal peasant farms in the formation of the budget of rural households was conducted. The focus on production on the sale of livestock products is primarily due to the existing material and technical base and the industrial orientation of rural households.
Analysis of agricultural production show a high resistance to PF transformations of the economy, and in the process of socio-economic transformation of the economy significantly changing place and role of private farms.
The focus on production on the sale of livestock products is primarily due to the existing material and technical base and the industrial orientation of rural households. In addition, in the context of the crisis, livestock production in agricultural enterprises has become situational major producers of dairy and meat cattle breeding and pig breeding.
Analysis of agricultural production show a high resistance to PF transformations of the economy, and in the process of socio-economic transformation of the economy significantly changing place and role of private farms.
One of the factors behind the economic sustainability of private farms is that, due to differences in the sectorial structure and specialization of production, they do not compete with large agricultural enterprises. There was a situation where peasant farms increase the production of those products whose volumes are reduced by agricultural enterprises
It should be noted that in 2016, about 46.4% of rural households did not receive income from sales of products derived from their own peasant farms. Analyzing this indicator, we can state that this category of rural households uses fully obtained agricultural products to meet their own needs in food products, or completely abandoned its management. This circumstance is caused by the difficult demographic situation in rural settlements and the reorientation to other sources of cash flow of members of rural families.
Analyzing the problem of agricultural products produced in private farms, we consider it appropriate to emphasize that the main seller in the natural markets are directly agricultural producers. According to numerous observations, the sale of products is carried out in unsanitary conditions, in another way – "from the ground." However, there are no complaints about the lack of buyers on the part of sellers. And this is when the retail areas in the city are free trade areas.
According to our belief, realization on spontaneous markets is an anachronism of a developed society, which serves as an indicator of a low level of living and a primitive culture of food. After all, livestock products, which are realized through the mentioned channel, have not passed the appropriate veterinary and sanitary control. In addition, the environment in which the sale, contributes to bacteriological contamination.
In the current environment to determine the prospects for further development subsidiary farming as a source of income for rural households is impossible, because given the current disparity between rural and between the city in social and economic development and the availability of land area that will be in private ownership and the need for fresh, production and sale of agricultural products will be carried out in private farms.
It is established that the development of a personal peasant farm will be influenced by the environment of the rural community in which the peasants are located. On the other hand, the younger generation of villagers that steeped in atmosphere and rising rural incomes and agricultural products in obtaining production creates all the preconditions for not receiving it in private farms.
Key words: income, realization, budget, rural housebuilding, marketing, animal husbandry, plant growing.
1. Malik, M.J., Shpykuljak, O.G. (2018). Tendencii' i perspektyvy rozvytku osobystyh seljans'kyh gospodarstv [Trends and prospects for the development of personal peasant farms]. Ekonomika APK. № 1, 11 p.
2. Gubeni, Ju. E., Koverko, Ju.O., Osishhuk, P.O. (2017). Rozvytok osobystyh seljans'kyh gospodarstv v umovah instytucional'nyh zmin [Development of private peasant farms in conditions of institutional changes.]. Ekonomika Ukrai'ny. No 3, pp. 59-67.
3. Malik, M.J., Kropyvko, M.M., Mamchur, V.A. (2017). Rozvytok seljans'kyh gospodarstv v umovah transformacij agrarnogo sektoru ekonomiky [Development of peasant farms in the conditions of transformation of the agrarian sector of the economy]. K., NNC IAE. 84 p.
4. Svynous, I.V., Ibatullin, M.I. (2015). Rozvytok kooperatyvnyh zv’jazkiv pry vyrobnyctvi i zbutu produkcii' osobystymy seljans'kymy gospodarstvamy [Development of cooperative ties in the production and sale of products by private peasant farms]. Innovacijna ekonomika. No 3, pp. 180-184.
5. Tulush, L.D., Gryshhenko, O.Ju. (2018). Transformacija vysokotovarnyh gospodarstv naselennja v sub’jekty pidpryjemnyctva: podatkovo-bjudzhetni aspekty [Transformation of high-value households to entrepreneurs: tax-budget aspects]. Ekonomika APK. No 1, 40 p.
6. Udova, L.O. (2014). Osobysti seljans'ki gospodarstva u systemi obov’jazkovyh platezhiv [Personal peasant farms in the system of mandatory payments]. Aktual'ni problemy ekonomiky. No 3, pp. 455-462.
7. Javors'ka, T.I., Franchuk, I.B. (2014). Transformacija osobystyh seljans'kyh gospodarstv u pidpryjemnyc'ki struktury [Transformation of private peasant farms into entrepreneurial structures]. Zbirnyk naukovyh prac' Tavrijs'kogo derzhavnogo agrotehnologichnogo universytetu (ekonomichni nauky). No 3(27), pp. 48-52.
8. Sokolova, A.O. Golij, N.P. (2013). Osobysti seljans'ki gospodarstva jak stabilizujucha lanka u vyrobnyctvi produkcii' tvarynnyctva Volyns'koi' oblasti [Personal peasant farms as a stabilizing link in the production of livestock products in the Volyn region.]. Produktyvnist' agropromyslovogo vyrobnyctva. ekonomichni nauky. Vol. 24. pp. 52-58.
9. Vojnycha, L.J. (2010). Osobysti seljans'ki gospodarstva u formuvanni kooperatyvnyh organizacij [Personal peasant farms in the formation of cooperative organizations]. Naukovyj visnyk L'vivs'kogo nacional'nogo universytetu veterynarnoi' medycyny ta biotehnologij im [Scientific herald of the Lviv National University of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnology]. G'zhyc'kogo. Vol. 12, № 2(5), pp. 18-21.
10. Kropyvko, M. (2016). Osobysti seljans'ki gospodarstva: fenomen chy ob’jektyvni obstavyny? [Personal peasant farms: a phenomenon or objective circumstances?]. Ekonomichnyj dyskurs. Vol. 1, pp. 11-21.
11. Markovych, N.V. (2016). Osobysti seljans'ki gospodarstva L'vivshhyny: produktyvnist', efektyvnist', perspektyvy [Personal peasant farms of Lviv region: productivity, efficiency, prospects]. Visnyk Odes'kogo nacional'nogo universytetu. Serija : Ekonomika. No. 21, Vol. 8, pp. 41-45.
12. Naumenko, V.V. (2016). Osobysti seljans'ki gospodarstva Hersonshhyny, i'h osoblyvosti ta perspektyvy rozvytku [Personal peasant farms of the Kherson region, their peculiarities and prospects of development.]. Produktyvnist' agropromyslovogo vyrobnyctva. No 28, pp. 86-94.
13. Jurchyshyn, V. (2012). Konceptual'no vazhlyvyj naukovyj pogljad na gospodarstva naselennja Ukrai'ny. Ekonomika Ukrai'ny. [Conceptually important scientific view of the economy of the population of Ukraine. Ukraine economy]. No 4,
pp. 86-87.
14. Jarema, L.V. (2013). Rozvytok sil'skogo gospodarstva Ternopil's'koi' oblasti ta jogo vplyv na riven' zhyttja sil's'kogo naselennja [The development of agriculture in the Ternopil region and its impact on the living standards of the rural population]. Naukovyj visnyk Nacional'nogo universytetu bioresursiv i pryrodokorystuvannja Ukrai'ny. Ser. : Ekonomika, agrarnyj menedzhment, biznes. Vol. 181(1), pp. 8-14.
15. Reshyt'ko, T.V. (2014). Osoblyvosti zajnjatosti ta dohodiv naselennja v osobystyh seljans'kyh gospodarstvah [Peculiarities of employment and income of the population in private peasant farms]. Naukovi praci Kirovograds'kogo nacional'nogo tehnichnogo universytetu. Ekonomichni nauky. Vol. 25, pp. 78-84.
16. Bulah, T.M., Plahotnikova, L.O. (2013). Osobysti gospodarstva ta i'hnja rol' u formuvanni rivnja dobrobutu sil's'kogo naselennja [Personal farms and their role in shaping the welfare of the rural population.]. Formuvannja rynkovyh vidnosyn v Ukrai'ni. No 2, pp. 195-198.
17. Kal'chenko, S.V. (2014). Shljahy optymizacii' ocinky ekonomichnoi' efektyvnosti sil's'kogospodars'kogo vyrobnyctva v gospodarstvah naselennja [Ways of optimization of estimation of economic efficiency of agricultural production in households]. Zbirnyk naukovyh prac' Tavrijs'kogo derzhavnogo agrotehnologichnogo universytetu (ekonomichni nauky).
No 2, pp. 84-87.
18. Kropyvko, M.M. (2014). Formal'ni ob’jednannja gospodarstv naselennja vyrobnychoi' sfery sil's'kogo gospodarstva [Formal associations of households of the agricultural production sector]. Stalyj rozvytok ekonomiky. No 2, pp. 168-176.
19. Podatkovyj kodeks Ukrai'ny redakcija vid 23.02.2017. No 1910-VIII. URL: http://zakon0.rada.gov.ua/ laws/show/2755-17/page/
20. Kropyvko, M.M. (2014). Formal'ni ob’jednannja gospodarstv naselennja vyrobnychoi' sfery sil's'kogo gospodarstva [Formal associations of households of the agricultural production sector]. Stalyj rozvytok ekonomiky. No 2, pp. 168-176.
21. Zapsha, G.M., Didur, G.I. (2015). Gospodarstva naselennja v agrarnomu vyrobnyctvi regioniv Ukrai'ny [Households in the agrarian production of the regions of Ukraine]. Agrosvit. № 8, pp. 3-6.
22. Talavyrja, M.P. (2008). Organizacijno-ekonomichnyj mehanizm derzhavnoi' pidtrymky rozvytku sil's'kyh terytorij [Organizational and Economic Mechanism of State Support to the Development of Rural Areas]. K., Vyd-vo NAU, 384 p.
23. Krysanov, D., Udova, L., Varchenko, O. (2012). Sil's'ki domogospodarstva Ukrai'ny v umovah globalizacii' [Rural Households of Ukraine in the Conditions of Globalization.]. Ekonomist. No 4, pp. 32-39.
24. Zakon krai'ny «Pro bezpechnist' ta jakist' harchovyh produktiv» vid 23.12.97 r. No 771/97-VR (u redakcii' Zakonu Ukrai'ny № 406 – VII vid 11.08.2013 r.) URL: http://zakon.nau.ua/doc/?uid=1086.726.0
25. Svynous, I.V. (2010). Ekonomichni aspekty funkcionuvannja osobystyh seljans'kyh gospodarstv: мonografija [Economic aspects of the functioning of individual peasant farms: мonograph]. K., Agrar Media Grup, 414 p.
26. Tulush, L.D. (2010). Formuvannja mehanizmu opodatkuvannja dohodiv vid vedennja osobystogo seljans'kogo gospodarstva [Formation of the mechanism of taxation of income from the management of a private peasant economy]. Naukovyj visnyk Nacional'nogo universytetu DPS Ukrai'ny. Serija: Ekonomika, pravo. No 1, pp. 144–151.
27. Zbars'kyj, V.K., Nepochatenko, O.O. (2011). Osobyste seljans'ke gospodarstvo u zabezpechenni prodovol'choi' bezpeky Ukrai'ny [Personal peasant economy in ensuring food security of Ukraine.]. Zb. nauk. pr. Umans'kogo nacional'nogo universytetu sadivnyctva. A.F. Golovchuk (vidp. red.) ta in. Uman'. Ekonomika. Vol. 76, No. 2, 412 p.
28. Grynchuk, Ju.O., Svynous, I.V. (2012). Metodychni pidhody do traktuvannja ponjattja “osobyste seljans'ke gospodarstvo” jak formy dribnotovarnogo vyrobnyctva [Methodical approaches to the interpretation of the concept of "personal peasant economy" as a form of small-scale production]. Ekonomika ta upravlinnja APK : zb. nauk. pr. Bilocerk. nac. agrarn. un-t. Bila Cerkva. Vol. 8 (95).
29. Ljutyk, T. V. (2006). Ekonomiko-organizacijnyj mehanizm funkcionuvannja osobystyh seljans'kyh gospodarstv [Economic-organizational mechanism of functioning of personal peasant farms: author's abstract]: avtoref. dys. ... k.e.n. : 08.07.02. 20 p.
30. Bondarenko, N.M. (2006). Sutnisni aspekty samozajnjatosti v osobystyh seljans'kyh gospodarstvah [Essential aspects of self-employment in private peasant farms]. Visnyk Poltavs'kogo derzhavnoi' agrarnoi' akademii'. Ser.: Ekonomika. No. 4, pp. 56-63.