You are here
Peculiarities of reproduction of human capital in rural areas
The article summarizes the factors that have the most signi¿cant negative impact on the development of social and economic spheres of rural areas. Research on the response of human capital to destructive manifestations in the economy is highlighted, as well as a number of factors of manifestation of these destructive phenomena in the development of rural areas.
Analyzed the most priority problems of development of rural areas in relation to each stage of social progress. Isolated and characterized the key steps in the development of the agricultural sector and its spatial framework of rural territories, namely with the settlements in which they lived rural, and has concentrated material and technical means of production.
The highest priority issues of rural development in relation to each stage of social progress are analyzed. The key stages of development of the agricultural sector and its spatial basis – rural areas, namely with the settlements in which the villagers lived and the material and technical means of production were concentrated, are highlighted and characterized.
Special attention is paid to the causes of migration of the rural population, which in turn has led to the search and analysis of certain measures to inhibit the negative e൵ects of this process. It was found out that the implementation of agrarian and land reforms, as well as the transition to a socially oriented model of market economy had a negative impact, resulting in an increase in the number of degrading villages and the formation of new organizational and legal forms.
A number of negative trends a൵ecting the development of the agricultural sector have been identi¿ed, among which the social resources of rural areas are a priority. It was found that the main element of social resources of the village is the rural population, the lion's share of which belongs to labor resources, which act as a link, which determines the interdependence of its economic and social development.
It is substantiated that the constant presence of the socio-economic system, which is a rural area, in a state of counteraction to "external shocks" causes changes in the speci¿c content of the characteristics of the environment and its resources, which requires consideration of its state in developing strategic rural development programs. The basic principles of formation of human capital reproduction potential
of rural territories are allocated, functions of rural territories as a habitat and vital activity and directions of purposeful policy of rural development are generalized.
Key words: reproduction of human capital, rural areas, sustainable development, rural development.
The highest priority issues of rural development in relation to each stage of social progress are analyzed. The key stages of development of the agricultural sector and its spatial basis – rural areas, namely with the settlements in which the villagers lived and the material and technical means of production were concentrated, are highlighted and characterized.
Special attention is paid to the causes of migration of the rural population, which in turn has led to the search and analysis of certain measures to inhibit the negative e൵ects of this process. It was found out that the implementation of agrarian and land reforms, as well as the transition to a socially oriented model of market economy had a negative impact, resulting in an increase in the number of degrading villages and the formation of new organizational and legal forms.
A number of negative trends a൵ecting the development of the agricultural sector have been identi¿ed, among which the social resources of rural areas are a priority. It was found that the main element of social resources of the village is the rural population, the lion's share of which belongs to labor resources, which act as a link, which determines the interdependence of its economic and social development.
It is substantiated that the constant presence of the socio-economic system, which is a rural area, in a state of counteraction to "external shocks" causes changes in the speci¿c content of the characteristics of the environment and its resources, which requires consideration of its state in developing strategic rural development programs. The basic principles of formation of human capital reproduction potential
of rural territories are allocated, functions of rural territories as a habitat and vital activity and directions of purposeful policy of rural development are generalized.
Key words: reproduction of human capital, rural areas, sustainable development, rural development.
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1162-00831. Lindyuk, A.O. and Lipchuk, T.V. (2011). Rural environment as a factor in the formation of human capital in agriculture. Agrosvit, no.13–14. Available at: http://www.agrosvit.info/pdf/13-14_2011/6.pdf
2. Zinchuk, T.O., Kotenko, N.M. and Prokopchuk, O.A.(2017). Evolutionary priorities of investing in rural development of Ukraine. Global and national economic problems. Mykolayiv National University named after V.O. Sukhomlinsky. No 16, pp. 139–144. Available at: http://global-national.in.ua/archive/16-2017/16_2017.pdf.
3. Galkiv, L.I. and Galaz, L.V. (2018). Motivation of human capitalization of rural settlements. Problems of economy and management. No 897, pp. 49–56. Available at: http://ena.lp.edu.ua:8080/handle/ntb/44455.
4. Directions and means of development of rural areas in the context of strengthening the socio-economic security of Ukraine: a monograph / ed. Doctor of Economics, Prof. T.G. Vasiltseva, Ph.D., Assoc. VV Boyko. Lviv: Liga-Press. 260 p. Available at: http://ird.gov.ua/irdp/p20160804.pdf.
5. Shepotko, L.A., Prokopa, I.V., Plonsky, V.Ja. and Skurskaya, N.M. (1981). Approximation of socio-economic development of the city and village. Kyiv: Naukova Dumka, pp. 31–34, 228–230.
6. Economic and social problems of the agricultural sector. Overcoming signi¿cant di൵erences between city and village. Kyiv: Naukova Dumka,1986, pp.11–28.
7. The man in the agricultural sector Kiev: Naukova Dumka, 1991, pp. 235–267. ISBN 5-120023-10-Х. Library and bibliographic classi¿cation 60.550.663Я9
8. Shepotko, L.O. (1991). The Ukrainian Village: problems and prospects. Kyiv: Harvest. 235 p.
9. Krysanov, D.F. (1991). Dynamics of rural displacement and problems of regulation of the displacement process. Economy of Soviet Ukraine. No. 11, pp. 19–27.
10. Borodina, O.M. and others. (2010). Rural development theory, policy and practice. Methodological approaches to the denition of rural development. Kyiv. 376 p. Available at: http://ief.org.ua/docs/mg/81.pdf.
11. Shepotko, L.O., Prokopa, I.V., Gudzinsky, S.O. and Yarovy, V.D. (2003). The rural sector of Ukraine is at the turn of the millennium. In 2 volumes. Vol. 2. Social resources of rural areas. Kyiv: Institute of Economics of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, pp. 47–50.
12. Economic activity of the population of Ukraine: statistical collection. Kyiv: State Statistics Service of Ukraine, 2011, pp. 120–121,191,196. Available at: https://ukrstat.org/uk/druk/publicat/Arhiv_u/11/Arch_ean_zb.htm.
13. Agriculture of Ukraine for 2000-2017: statistical collection. Kyiv: State Statistics Service of Ukraine, 2018. 38 р. Available at: http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/druk/publicat/
kat_u/2018/zb/09/zb_sg2017_pdf.pdf.
14. Shepotko, L.O., Prokopa, I.V., Gudzinsky, S.O. and Yarovy, V.D. (2003). The rural sector of Ukraine is at the turn of the millennium. Social resources of rural areas. Institute of Economics of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. Kyiv. Vol. 2, pp. 47–50.
15. Borodina, O.M. (2010). Applied principles of rural development. Rural development theory, policy and practice. Kyiv. 376 p. Available at: http://ief.org.ua/docs/mg/81.pdf.
16. Borodina, O.M. (2010). Genesis and tasks of rural development policy in Ukraine.Rural development theory, policy and practice. Kyiv. 376 p. Available at: http://ief.org.ua/docs/mg/81.pdf/
17. Monitoring the process of decentralization of power and reform of local self-government. As of January 10, 2019. Ukraine. Available at: km-oblrada.gov.ua/minregion-oprilyudniv-monitoring-pro/.
18. Tugluk, V. (2019). The main thing is progress, not process. The united communities show steady progress in the economic and social spheres. Government courier, no. 76, pp. 6–9. Available at: https://ukurier.gov.ua/uk/articles/golovneprogres-ne-proces/.
19. Borodina, O.M. (2012). Socioeconomic development of agriculture and rural areas: a modern dimension. Kyiv, pp. 214–257. Available at: http://ief.org.ua/docs/mg/97.pdf.
20. The World Bank Annual Report 2019: Ending Poverty, Investing in Opportunity (Chinese). Washington, D.C.: World Bank Group. Available at: http://documents.worldbank.
org/curated/en/478101570466007250/The-World-Bank-Annual-Report-2019-Ending-Poverty-Investing-in-Opportunity.
21. Kamiska, K. (2012). The case of agriculture. The present and future of agriculture in Mazovia / for order. I. Magda. IV quarterly report. Institute for Structural Studies. Warsaw.
22. Human capital in the process of structural transformation of rural areas and agriculture / A. Vrochalska and others. Warsaw, 2014. 126 p. ISBN 978-83-7658-533-8
2. Zinchuk, T.O., Kotenko, N.M. and Prokopchuk, O.A.(2017). Evolutionary priorities of investing in rural development of Ukraine. Global and national economic problems. Mykolayiv National University named after V.O. Sukhomlinsky. No 16, pp. 139–144. Available at: http://global-national.in.ua/archive/16-2017/16_2017.pdf.
3. Galkiv, L.I. and Galaz, L.V. (2018). Motivation of human capitalization of rural settlements. Problems of economy and management. No 897, pp. 49–56. Available at: http://ena.lp.edu.ua:8080/handle/ntb/44455.
4. Directions and means of development of rural areas in the context of strengthening the socio-economic security of Ukraine: a monograph / ed. Doctor of Economics, Prof. T.G. Vasiltseva, Ph.D., Assoc. VV Boyko. Lviv: Liga-Press. 260 p. Available at: http://ird.gov.ua/irdp/p20160804.pdf.
5. Shepotko, L.A., Prokopa, I.V., Plonsky, V.Ja. and Skurskaya, N.M. (1981). Approximation of socio-economic development of the city and village. Kyiv: Naukova Dumka, pp. 31–34, 228–230.
6. Economic and social problems of the agricultural sector. Overcoming signi¿cant di൵erences between city and village. Kyiv: Naukova Dumka,1986, pp.11–28.
7. The man in the agricultural sector Kiev: Naukova Dumka, 1991, pp. 235–267. ISBN 5-120023-10-Х. Library and bibliographic classi¿cation 60.550.663Я9
8. Shepotko, L.O. (1991). The Ukrainian Village: problems and prospects. Kyiv: Harvest. 235 p.
9. Krysanov, D.F. (1991). Dynamics of rural displacement and problems of regulation of the displacement process. Economy of Soviet Ukraine. No. 11, pp. 19–27.
10. Borodina, O.M. and others. (2010). Rural development theory, policy and practice. Methodological approaches to the denition of rural development. Kyiv. 376 p. Available at: http://ief.org.ua/docs/mg/81.pdf.
11. Shepotko, L.O., Prokopa, I.V., Gudzinsky, S.O. and Yarovy, V.D. (2003). The rural sector of Ukraine is at the turn of the millennium. In 2 volumes. Vol. 2. Social resources of rural areas. Kyiv: Institute of Economics of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, pp. 47–50.
12. Economic activity of the population of Ukraine: statistical collection. Kyiv: State Statistics Service of Ukraine, 2011, pp. 120–121,191,196. Available at: https://ukrstat.org/uk/druk/publicat/Arhiv_u/11/Arch_ean_zb.htm.
13. Agriculture of Ukraine for 2000-2017: statistical collection. Kyiv: State Statistics Service of Ukraine, 2018. 38 р. Available at: http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/druk/publicat/
kat_u/2018/zb/09/zb_sg2017_pdf.pdf.
14. Shepotko, L.O., Prokopa, I.V., Gudzinsky, S.O. and Yarovy, V.D. (2003). The rural sector of Ukraine is at the turn of the millennium. Social resources of rural areas. Institute of Economics of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. Kyiv. Vol. 2, pp. 47–50.
15. Borodina, O.M. (2010). Applied principles of rural development. Rural development theory, policy and practice. Kyiv. 376 p. Available at: http://ief.org.ua/docs/mg/81.pdf.
16. Borodina, O.M. (2010). Genesis and tasks of rural development policy in Ukraine.Rural development theory, policy and practice. Kyiv. 376 p. Available at: http://ief.org.ua/docs/mg/81.pdf/
17. Monitoring the process of decentralization of power and reform of local self-government. As of January 10, 2019. Ukraine. Available at: km-oblrada.gov.ua/minregion-oprilyudniv-monitoring-pro/.
18. Tugluk, V. (2019). The main thing is progress, not process. The united communities show steady progress in the economic and social spheres. Government courier, no. 76, pp. 6–9. Available at: https://ukurier.gov.ua/uk/articles/golovneprogres-ne-proces/.
19. Borodina, O.M. (2012). Socioeconomic development of agriculture and rural areas: a modern dimension. Kyiv, pp. 214–257. Available at: http://ief.org.ua/docs/mg/97.pdf.
20. The World Bank Annual Report 2019: Ending Poverty, Investing in Opportunity (Chinese). Washington, D.C.: World Bank Group. Available at: http://documents.worldbank.
org/curated/en/478101570466007250/The-World-Bank-Annual-Report-2019-Ending-Poverty-Investing-in-Opportunity.
21. Kamiska, K. (2012). The case of agriculture. The present and future of agriculture in Mazovia / for order. I. Magda. IV quarterly report. Institute for Structural Studies. Warsaw.
22. Human capital in the process of structural transformation of rural areas and agriculture / A. Vrochalska and others. Warsaw, 2014. 126 p. ISBN 978-83-7658-533-8
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
 utechenko_d._1-2020.pdf | 957.96 KB |