You are here
Theory of intepretation of the economic category of effeciency
In modern conditions of the development of competition and lack of resources the main aim of any enterprise is to ensure its
effective functioning. In recent years the topic of essence of the category of efficiency in general, and in agrarian production in
particular, has been raised more often during the debates of the prominent scholars. Their views concerning the definition of
efficiency as an economic category are based on adequate resources; however the problem is that they are very different.
Consequently, an accurate interpretation of the category of efficiency and its indicators has not been proposed in Ukraine. In this
respect, the evaluation of the results of functioning of agrarian enterprises in modern market conditions, in our opinion, is incomplete
and relative in nature.
Various points of view on economic efficiency, its criteria and indicators are argued in economic literature, but the subject is
still controversial. One of the main principles of economic management is to ensure that the process of achieving results in agrarian
production should be correlated with the reduction of expenses per unit, and the high rate of compensation costs from its selling. In
this regard, the essence of efficiency not only depicts the effect as a result of any action or production, but also shows if this effect is
justified.
Efficiency of production as an economic category demonstrates the proficiency of objective economic principles and is
reflected in the production results. Economic efficiency illustrates the final effect of human labor, means of production, as well as
their contribution in cooperation.
Efficiency of production is a category of expanded reproduction that characterizes a level of achievement of the main goals,
determined by reproduction. Most of the economists make a distinction between industrial-technological, industrial-economic,
social-economic and environmental-economic efficiency. Economic efficiency is measured by a comparison of the final effect
(result) and resources in use or expenses. This is due to the fact that the results can be related to expenses and the amount of the
resources involved in the process of production.
The concept of economic efficiency has a fundamental significance and reflects its prominent role in the development of society
and achievement of new goals. Notion of efficiency is seen as a real and absolute result of production, product value. There is an
opinion, that efficiency of economic activity should be considered as a result referred to particular goals set in a sphere of production,
division, consumption, i.e. in the process of reproduction.
Economic investigations have established that the evolution of category of efficiency are stipulated by industrial forces and
productive relations in society, and its criteria are determined by the content of the main economic principles.
Summarizing the existing approaches to the definition of efficiency we can conclude that economic efficiency reflects the
positive effect of the use of means of production and human labor, a feedback based on their mutual efforts. Efficiency in field of
agrarian production is defined as obtaining the maximum amount of products per hectare of land, from each household animal unit at
the lowest cost of human and actualized labor.
Therefore, the essence of efficiency of production lies in the achievment of the industrial goal at the lowest expenses. Notion of
efficiency of production reflects a particular aspect of functioning and development of industrial relations which leads to specific
results and expenses of social labor.
Keywords: efficiency, efficient production, economic category of efficiency, economic effect.
1. Andrijchuk V. G. Efektyvnist' dijal'nosti agrarnyh pidpryjemstv: teorija, metodyka, analiz: monogr. / V. G. Andrijchuk. – K.:
KNEU, 2005. – 292 s.
2. Korenjuk P. I. Ekologo-ekonomichna efektyvnist' vidtvorjuval'noi' systemy prodovol'chogo kompleksu: teorija, meto-
dologija, praktyka: monogr. / P. I. Korenjuk. – Dnipropetrovs'k: Dnipropetrovs'ka derzhavna finansova akademija, 2005. – 355 s.
3. Buzdalov I. N. Na ternistom puti nauchnoj «reabilitacii» rynochnoj sistemy agrarnyh otnoshenij. Izbrannye trudy /
I. N. Buzdalov. – Т. 2. – M.: VIAPI im. A. A. Nikonova: JeRD, 2008. – 384 s.
4. Krysanov D. F. Formuvannja zbalansovanogo agrarnogo resursnogo potencialu i pidvyshhennja efektyvnosti vyrobnyctva:
dopovid' na Dvanadcjatyh richnyh zborah Vseukr. kongresu vchenyh ekonomistiv-agrarnykiv, 25–26 lystopada 2010 r. /
D. F. Krysanov. – K.: NNC «Instytut agrarnoi' ekonomiky», 2010. – 616 s.
5. Sabluk P. T. Osnovni naprjamy rozvytku vysokoefektyvnogo agropromyslovogo vyrobnyctva v Ukrai'ni / P. T. Sabluk //
Ekonomika APK. – 2002. – № 7. – S. 3–14.
6. Ivanov V. A. Intensifikacija sel'skohozjajstvennogo proizvodstva: problemy povyshenija jeffektivnosti / V. A. Ivanov. – M.:
Nauka, 1990. – 200 s.
7. Zhigalin M. M. Problemy formirovanija i jekonomicheskogo razvitija pticeproduktovogo podkompleksa (teorija, metodika,
praktika) / M. M. Zhigalin. – M.: Vysshaja shkola upravlenija agropromyshlennogo kompleksa i agrobiznesa, 1998. – 433 s.
8. Іvanu R. A. Spravochnik jekonomicheskih pokazatelej sel'skogo hozjajstva / R. A. Іvanu, M. M. Pantelejchuk,
I. V. Popovich - K.: Urozhaj, 1988. – 216 s.
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
2015_2_pidgornuy_ua.pdf | 265.93 KB |