You are here
State marketing in the improvement of pension provision in Ukraine
The paper aims to determine the features and justify the need to use state marketing to meet public needs as one of the types of marketing. It has been found out that the main goal of state marketing is to study and form a complex of needs (individual, group, public) and develop effective ways to satisfy them, taking into account real economic opportunities and other limiting factors.
The study reveals the difference in state marketing and the political and social one. It is indicated that state marketing, along with well-known marketing tools, uses administrative, organizational, regulatory and other levers of influence.
It has been established that the state represented by the central and local government bodies is the main subject of state marketing. The state can directly participate in meeting needs and (or) create an environment and conditions for their implementation.
Some aspects of state marketing use are considered on the example of meeting the need for material support for people of retirement age. The main components of the set of state marketing in pension provision have been determined.
It has been proven that they are all interconnected and interdependent and require research, further improvement and development.
The key important tasks of the pension reform are considered. The decisive role of the state in pension provision has been proved. It is noted that radical measures are inappropriate to apply in the pension system reforming - it is necessary to predict the social consequences of the decisions taken, since they are often accompanied with active public protests. Therefore, any pension reform must be accompanied by appropriate marketing communications.
The main goal of state marketing in pension provision is determined. It involves the development of a pension system aimed at qualitative satisfaction of individual and collective needs in pension provision, as well as in creating conditions conducive to its effective functioning.
It is indicated that a comprehensive approach is required to reform the pension system along with improving the entire social protection system in the state, economic development stimulation, increase in the level of the population wages and employment.
Key words: needs, state marketing, marketing, pension provision, pension, political marketing, social marketing.
The study reveals the difference in state marketing and the political and social one. It is indicated that state marketing, along with well-known marketing tools, uses administrative, organizational, regulatory and other levers of influence.
It has been established that the state represented by the central and local government bodies is the main subject of state marketing. The state can directly participate in meeting needs and (or) create an environment and conditions for their implementation.
Some aspects of state marketing use are considered on the example of meeting the need for material support for people of retirement age. The main components of the set of state marketing in pension provision have been determined.
It has been proven that they are all interconnected and interdependent and require research, further improvement and development.
The key important tasks of the pension reform are considered. The decisive role of the state in pension provision has been proved. It is noted that radical measures are inappropriate to apply in the pension system reforming - it is necessary to predict the social consequences of the decisions taken, since they are often accompanied with active public protests. Therefore, any pension reform must be accompanied by appropriate marketing communications.
The main goal of state marketing in pension provision is determined. It involves the development of a pension system aimed at qualitative satisfaction of individual and collective needs in pension provision, as well as in creating conditions conducive to its effective functioning.
It is indicated that a comprehensive approach is required to reform the pension system along with improving the entire social protection system in the state, economic development stimulation, increase in the level of the population wages and employment.
Key words: needs, state marketing, marketing, pension provision, pension, political marketing, social marketing.
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0978-74551. Gavrylechko, Ju.V. (2018). Kompleks marketyngovyh komunikacij sub’jektiv derzhavnogo upravlinnja. [Complex of marketing communications of subjects of public administration]. Public Administartion Aspects. No 6 (11–12), pp. 5–12. DOI: 10.15421/151868.
2. Gavrysh-Musafr, A. (2016). Marketyng organiv derzhavnoi' vlady jak mehanizm pidvyshhennja rivnja zhyttja naselennja. [Marketing of public authorities as a mechanism to improve living standards]. Molodyj vchenyj. No 8, pp. 221–225.
3. Goncharenko, K.I. (2018). Osoblyvosti zastosuvannja derzhavnogo marketyngu v upravlins'kij dijal'nosti. [Features of the application of public marketing in management] Publichne upravlinnja ta mytne administruvannja. [Public administration and customs administration]. No 1 (18), pp. 48–51. Available at: http://customs-admin.umsf.i.ua/archive/2018/1/7.pdf
4. Gorbyk, V. (2019). Adaptacija marketyngovoi' skladovoi' funkcionuvannja mehanizmu derzhavnogo upravlinnja pryrodno-ekonomichnym potencialom regioniv. [Adaptation of the marketing component of the functioning of the mechanism of state management of natural and economic potential of the regions]. Rublic Administartion Aspects. Vol. 7. No 1–2. DOI: 10.15421/15193.
5. Dejnega, O.V., Dejnega, I.O. (2020). Marketyng jak instrument rozvytku potencialu poslugovoi' dijal'nosti terytorial'nyh gromad. [Marketing as a tool for developing the service potential of local communities]. ΛΌGOΣ.ONLINE. DOI: 10.36074/2663-4139.12.03.
6. Kislov, D. (2013). Systema marketyngovyh komunikacij u derzhavnomu upravlinni. [The system of marketing communications in public administration]. Visnyk KNTEU. No 1, pp. 29–37. Available at: http://visnik.knute.edu. ua/fles/2013/01/3.pdf
7. Kislov, D.V. (2013). Sociokomunikacijnyj marketyng jak mehanizm derzhavnogo upravlinnja: osnovni pryncypy. [Socicommunication marketing as a mechanism of public administration: basic principles]. Svit social'nyh komunikacij. [World of Social Communications]. No 10, pp. 26–29. Available at: http://wsc.kymu.edu.ua/toms/10/026-029.pdf
8. Likarchuk, N. (2015). State marketing: factors of development. Social and Human Sciences. Vol. 3. Available at: https://scholar.google.com.ua/citations?view_op=view_ citation&hl=uk&user= WXIcuG0AAAAJ&sortby=pubdate&citation_for_view=WXIcuG0AAAAJ:3fE2CSJIrl8C
9. Oklander, M.A. (2017). Government and marketing. Materialy Mizhnarodnoi' naukovo-praktychnoi' internet-konferencii' “Marketyngovi innovacii' v osviti, turyzmi, gotel'no-restorannij, harchovij industrii' ta torgivli”. [Proceedings of the International Scientifc and Practical Internet Conference “Marketing Innovations in Education, Tourism, Hotel and Restaurant, Food Industry and Trade”]. 3–5 zhovtnja 2017 r. Harkivs'kyj derzhavnyj universytet harchuvannja ta torgivli, pp. 7–8. Available at: http://oklander.info/?p=1867
10. Olijnyk, V. (2017). Formuvannja systemy derzhavnogo marketyngu pisljadyplomnoi' osvity. [Formation of the system of state marketing of postgraduate education]. Visnyk pisljadyplomnoi' osvity. Serija: Upravlinnja ta administruvannja. Iss. 3(32), pp. 78–91.
11. Podol'chak, N.Ju., Bilyk, O.I., Hanyk, Ju.-B.R. (2020). Ponjattja publichnogo marketyngu ta pryklady jogo zastosuvannja v Ukrai'ni. [The concept of public marketing and examples of its application in Ukraine]. Investycii': praktyka ta dosvid. No 1, pp. 155–160. DOI: 10.32702/2306- 6814.2020.1.155.
12. Romanenko, Je.O., Chaplaj, I.V. (2016). Social'no-etychnyj marketyng v derzhavnomu upravlinni. [Socio-ethical marketing in public administration]. Publichne administruvannja: teorija ta praktyka: elektronnyj zbirnyk naukovyh prac'. Iss. 1 (15). Available at: http://www.dridu. dp.ua/zbirnik/2016-01(15)/6.pdf
13. Romanenko, Je.O., Chaplaj, I.V. (2016). Systema marketyngovyh komunikacij v mehanizmah derzhavnogo upravlinnja. [The system of marketing communications in the mechanisms of public administration]. Aktual'ni problemy ekonomiky. [Current Economic Problems]. No 4, pp. 69–78.
14. Romanenko, K.M. (2010). Derzhavnyj marketyng jak mehanizm maksymizacii' social'noi' efektyvnosti derzhavnogo upravlinnja. [Public marketing as a mechanism for maximizing the social efciency of public administration]. Investycii': praktyka ta dosvid. [Investments: Practice and Experience]. No 10, pp. 85–88. Available at: http:// www.investplan.com.ua/pdf/10_2010/25.pdf
15. Romat, Je. (2016). Marketyng u publichnomu upravlinni. [Marketing in public administration]. Visnyk KNTEU. [Bulletin of KNTEU]. No 4, pp. 56–65. Available at: http://visnik.knute.edu.ua/fles/2016/04/5.pdf
16. Chaplaj, I. (2015). Analiz vykorystannja instrumentiv marketyngu u systemi derzhavnogo upravlinnja. [Analysis of the use of marketing tools in the system of public administration]. Efektyvnist' derzhavnogo upravlinnja. Iss. 44, pp. 198–202. Available at: http://www.lvivacademy. com/vidavnitstvo_1/edu_44/fail/ch_1/27.pdf
17. Janchuk, T.V. (2017). Vykorystannja suchasnyh informacijnyh tehnologij v marketyngovomu mehanizmi derzhavnogo upravlinnja u regional'nomu rozvytku. [The use of modern information technologies in the marketing mechanism of public administration in regional development]. Ekonomika i organizacija upravlinnja. No 2 (26), pp. 100–108. Available at: https://jeou.donnu.edu.ua/article/ view/4783
18. Kotler, F., Keller, K.L. (2015). Marketing menedzhment. [Marketing management]. 14-e izd. SPb.: Piter, 800 p.
19. Drugov, A.A., Safn, A.R., Sendeckaja, S.V. (2005). Gosudarstvennyj marketing kak vazhnyj faktor sovershenstvovanija mehanizma upravlenija social'no-jekonomicheskimi processami v obshhestve. obshhestve [Public marketing as an important factor in improving the mechanism of management of socio-economic processes in society]. Marketing v Rossii i zarubezhom. [Marketing in Russia and abroad]. No 4, pp. 16–19.
20. Zvit pro robotu ta vykonannja bjudzhetu Pensijnogo fondu Ukrai'ny u 2019 roci. [Report on the work and execution of the budget of the Pension Fund of Ukraine in 2019]. Available at: https://www.pfu.gov.ua
21. Borg Pensijnogo fondu pered DKSU zris na 3 mlrd grn – do 65 mlrd grn. [The debt of the Pension Fund to the SCSU increased by UAH 3 billion to UAH 65 billion]. Finbalance, 28.02.2021. Available at: http//fnbalance.com. ua/news/borh-pensiynoho-fondu-pered-derzhkaznacheystvom-u-sichni-zbilshivsya-do-65-mlrd-hrn
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
 safn_o._sendetska_s._2-2021.pdf | 848.52 KB |