You are here
Сompetitiveness management components in agrarian higher education institutions
The paper summarizes the results of domestic and foreign scientists’studies on the principles of competitiveness management and their possible application in the formation of an efcient competitiveness management system in agrarian higher education institutions. The study singles out factors of higher education institutions functioning and reveals their interrelations and interdependence expedient to be considered in determining the approach to competitiveness management of educational institutions. The study proves that taking into account changes in the external environment at strategic management level makes it possible to identify new opportunities and challenges, develop measures to overcome the crises, which will further contribute to achieving the strategic goal as well as main and secondary goals of educational organizations. It is substantiated that university competitiveness management system is to be established on the basis of a combination of strategic management system, value concept and risk management. The main factors influencing the organizational system of educational institutions management were identifed on the basis of systematization of theoretical principles of management, namely, management levels, principles and methods, systems analysis, scientifc approach, differentiation and complexity. The components of the system of ensuring the competitiveness of higher agricultural institutions and their interrelation are identifed and the need to take into account the factors and conditions of educational, research, innovation, advisory and other activities in choosing an organizational system of competitiveness management. Based on the corroborated concept of agricultural competitiveness management, a logical model was developed in the form of a set of principles, methods and tools combining the development strategy, tactical and operational management adapted to current trends, dynamic uncertainty of the market environment and a holistic concept of strengthening the existing competitive advantages and the formation of new ones in the form of values. The authors proposed the competitiveness management algorithm comprising a set of interrelated methodological provisions. The logic of the competitiveness management process makes the base for the provisions, reflects its situational nature and the system of orderly and agreed procedures. It also involves values that form competitive advantage and are focused on the implementation of the strategy adopted by the educational organization. The study substantiated that the proposed model of higher education institutions competitiveness management should take into account the priorities of national strategies for development of higher education, agricultural sector, rural areas, as well as sustainable development strategies and competitiveness strategies ensuring the balanced development of higher education. The study results proved that ensuring and increasing the competitiveness of higher educational institution is a long-term process, which should be taken into account in strategic and tactical management.
Key words: higher education institution, agrarian higher education institution, competitiveness, competitiveness management, competitive advantages, competitive potential of the university, sustainable development.
1. Nikolaienko S.M., Nikolaienko M.S. (2021). Vyshcha ahrarna osvita v Ukraini: vyklyky chasu. [Higher agricultural education in Ukraine: challenges of the time]. Visnyk ahrarnoi nauky. [Bulletin of Agricultural Science]. No 12 (825), pp. 5–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31073/agrovisnyk202112-01.
2. Pro skhvalennia Kontseptsii reformuvannia i rozvytku ahrarnoi osvity ta nauky: Rozporiadzhennia Kabinetu Ministriv Ukrainy vid 6 kvit. 2011 r. № 279–p. [About approval of the Concept of reforming and development of agrarian education and science. Order of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine of April 6 2011. № 279-p]. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/ show/279-2011-%D1%80#Text.
3. Kobets A.S., Puhach A.M. (2016). Perspektyvni napriamy rozvytku derzhavnoi polityky intehratsii vyshchoi ahrarnoi osvity do yevropeiskoho osvitnoho prostoru. [Perspective directions of development of the state policy of integration of higher agrarian education into the European educational space]. Publichne upravlinnia ta mytne administruvannia. [Public administration and customs administration]. No 1 (14), pp. 55–60. Available at: https://dspace.dsau.dp.ua/bitstream/123456789/5458/1/10.pdf.
4. Paska I.M., Vasylenko O.I., Ponedilchuk T.V., Zabolotnyi V.S. (2021). Formuvannia fnansovykh pokaznykiv komertsializatsii osvitnikh posluh ahrarnykh zakladiv vyshchoi osvity Ukrainy. [Formation of commercialization fnancial indicators of educational services in ukrainian higher education agriculture institutions]. Finansovo-kredytna diialnist: problemy teorii i praktyky. [Financial and credit activities: problems of theory and practice]. No 6 (41), pp. 173–181. Available at: https://fkd.net.ua/index.php/fkd/article/view/3548/3444.
5. Nikolaienko S. (2015). Ahrarna osvita i nauka v Ukraini v umovakh yevrointehratsii: problemy ta vyklyky. [Agrarian education and science in Ukraine in the context of European integration: problems and challenges]. Vyshcha shkola. [High school]. No 11–12, pp. 19–28. Available at: https://nubip.edu.ua/ node/18498.
6. Danylenko A. (2012). Likvidatsiia dvoistosti: stan i perspektyvy rozvytku vyshchoi ahrarnoi osvity v Ukraini. [Elimination of duality: the state and prospects of higher agricultural education in Ukraine]. Osvita Ukrainy. [Education of Ukraine]. No 5, 7 р.
7. Kobets A.S., Puhach A.M. (2016). Suchasnyi stan osvitnikh posluh u sferi vyshchoi ahrarnoi osvity v Ukraini. [The current state of educational services in the feld of higher agricultural education in Ukraine]. Aspekty publichnoho upravlinnia. [Aspects of public administration]. No 6–7 (32–33), pp. 24–31. DOI: 10.15421/151625.
8. Nowak A., Rozanska-Boczula M. (2021). The Competitiveness of Agriculture in EM Member States According to the Competitiveness Pyramid Model. Agriculture. No 12, 28 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12010028.
9. Rosny J., Colmore C. (2018). Agricultural Education in Today’s School System: An Evaluation of Agricultural and Related Science Courses among High Schools in Alabama, USA. Social Sciences. No 7 (11), 218 p. DOI:10.3390/socsci7110218.
10. Lavrynenko E.T., Nevmerzhytska S.M. (2018). Upravlinnia konkurentnymy perevahamy pidpryiemstva. [Management of competitive advantages of the enterprise]. Skhidna Yevropa: ekonomika, biznes ta upravlinnia. [Eastern Europe: Economy, Business and Governance]. Iss. 6 (17), pp. 223–230. Available at: http://www.easterneurope-ebm.in.ua/journal/17_2018/42.pdf.
11. Kasych A. O., Kharkova Zh.V. (2016). Upravlinnia konkurentnymy perevahamy pidpryiemstva. [Management of competitive advantages of the enterprise]. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats «Ekonomichnyi analiz. [Collection of scientifc works "Economic analysis.] Ternopil: VPC TNEU "Economic Thought". Vol. 25. No 2, pp. 79–85.
12. Bilovol R.I. (2018). Systemnyi pidkhid do formuvannia metodiv upravlinnia pidpryiemstvom. [System approach to the formation of enterprise management methods]. Ekonomika i suspilstvo. [Economy and society]. No 15, pp. 219–223. Available at: https://economyandsociety.in.ua/journals/15_ukr/34.pdf.
13. Palekha Yu., Moshek H., Mykolaichuk I. (2018). Osnovy menedzhmentu teoriia i praktyka: navchalnyi posibnyk. [Fundamentals of management theory and practice: textbook]. Kyiv: Lira-K, 528 p.
14. Nehoda Yu.V. (2020). Kontseptsiia realizatsii prohramno-tsilovoho upravlinnia pry systemnii transformatsii ahrarnoho sektoru ekonomiky. [The concept of realization of program-target management at system transformation of agrarian sector of economy]. Ahrosvit. No 5, pp. 17–24. DOI: 10.32702/2306!6792.2020.5.17.
15. Vartsaba V. I., Tranovych Yu. P. (2014). Prohramno-tsilovyi metod yak instrument vdoskonalennia biudzhetnoho planuvannia. [Program-target method as a tool for improving budget planning]. Naukovyi visnyk Uzhhorodskoho universytetu. Seriia: Ekonomika. [Scientifc Bulletin of Uzhgorod University. Series: Economics]. Iss. 3, pp. 100–102.
16. Kharchuk T.V., Kurhuzenkova L.A. (2018). Tsinnisno-oriientovani imperatyvy ekonomichnoho upravlinnia pidpryiemstvom. [Value-oriented imperatives of economic management of the enterprise]. Derzhava ta rehiony. Seriia: Ekonomika ta pidpryiemnytstvo. [State and regions. Series: Economics and Entrepreneurship]. No 4, pp. 133–138.
17. Kutsenko M.M. (2012). Tsinnisno-oriientovanyi pidkhid v upravlinni prohramamy innovatsiinoho rozvytku na osnovi systemy upravlinnia znanniamy. [Value-oriented approach in the management of innovation development programs based on the knowledge management system]. Tekhnolohichnyi audyt ta rezevy vyrobnytstva. [Technological audit and production reserves]. No 6 (4), pp. 7–8.
18. Yevtushenko V.A., Kudinova M.M. (2021). Orhanizatsiina povedinka: konspekt lektsii. [Organizational behavior: lecture notes]. Kharkiv: KhNU im. V. N. Karazina, 84 p.
19. Parkhomenko N.O. (2020). Autsorsynh yak stratehiia orhanizatsiinoho rozvytku biznes-system u hlobalnomu seredovyshchi. [Outsourcing as a strategy for organizational development of business systems in a global environment]. Naukovyi visnyk Uzhhorodskoho natsionalnoho universytetu. [Scientifc Bulletin of Uzhhorod National University]. Iss. 33. Vol. 2, pp. 21–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2413-9971/2020-33-26.
20. Porter M. (2005). Konkurentnaia stratehyia, per. s anhl. [Competitive Strategy, trans. with English]. Moscow: Alpyna Byznes Buks, 454 p.
21. Porter M. (2011). Konkurentnaia stratehyia: metodyka analyza otraslei y konkurentov; per. s anhl. 4-e yzd. [Competitive strategy: methods of analysis of industries and competitors; trans. with English 4th ed]. Moscow: Alpyna Pablysher, 453 p.
22. Porter M. (2018). Konkurentnoe preymushchestvo. Kak dostych vыsokoho rezultata y obespechyt eho ustoichyvost; per. s anhl. [Competitive advantage. How to achieve a high result and ensure its sustainability, trans. with English]. Moscow: Alpyna Pablysher, 716 p.
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
vasilenko_1_2022.pdf | 717.31 KB |