You are here
Priorities for the development of infrastructure of agricultural territories as providing complex sustainable development
components of the rural infrastructure development and their influence on the socio-economic situationof Vinnytsiya are asanalyzed.
The influence of agrarian productionon thedevelopment of rural infrastructure is justified. It is emphasized that
thedevelopment of rural areas today is characterized by the aggravation of a numberof problems, the most serious ofwhich
are the demographiccrisis, the decline of social infrastructure, the unemployment and poverty, but the most important problem is that the land use issues are not regulated.
The strategic importance of the multifunctional development of rural areas is studied, taking into account theexperience
of the countries – members of the European Union and the Council of Europe. It is proved that in order to provide the
effective development of rural infrastructure it is necessary to work out a state program ofthe developmentof a separate area,
taking into account its natural features. It has been determinedthat theintroduction of non-agricultural activities, in particular
eco-innovations, is the solution of the global problemsof rural areas.
It has been outlined that the presence of the effectively functioning social infrastructure of rural areas is one of thedeterminants
of not only the social stability but also of the effective management. It has been determined that theabsence of important structural
elements of the social sphere causes the plenty outflowof labor from rural areas, as well as their decline.
It has been established that the social infrastructure is a material base of the social sphere of the village and a setof the
objects belonging to the service sector of the rural population (utilities, transport, communication, trade, publiccatering,
householdservices, healthcare, socialservices, education, culture, art and sports). Their functioningis aimed at satisfying the
rural population’sneeds.
It has been investigated that during the year so find ependence the considerable structural reforms were carried out in the
village, the landand property relations were radically reorganized, the organizational and legal structuresof the market
orientation on the basis of private ownership of the land and property, as well as the individual, familyand collective forms of
labor organization were created. It has been discovered that the agro-industrial complexbecame the focus of the increased
economic activity and theinvestment attractiveness.
It isanalyzed that the introduction of non-agricultural activities, in particular greentourism, can become the solution for today’s
problems of the development of agro-industrial complex and the effective functioning of rural areas, andat the same time, of the
improvement of their infrastructure. It is proved that rural areas are not only the spatialbasis of production, but also the natural
environment and people’s place of life. That is why the efficiency of the useof the territory depends on the person, his cultural and
educational level, professional training, political activity, skills, motivation, desire and ability to work and manage.
It is motivated that the development of agrarian and non-agrarian activities capable of creating the necessaryfinancial basis for
serious socio-economic transformations in the countryside and ensuring the proper livingconditions of the population should be the
basis for the revival of rural territories. At the same time, it is extremelynecessary to develop a new paradigm of management of
agrarian enterprises in order to increase the efficiency oftheir economic activity, to implement a comprehensive program for the
development of the agro-industrial complexof the region by creating an effective system of relations at all levels of government. It is
proved that today thepriority task of state authorities and local self-government is the social rebirth of the village.
It is argumented that the activation of the infrastructure of the Ukrainian village is possible thanks to the statesupport of
the agrarian sector in combination with the development of rural areas. It is extremely necessary todevelop a new paradigm
of the management of agrarian enterprises in order to increase the efficiency of theireconomic activity, to implement a
comprehensive program for the development of the agro-industrial complex ofthe region by creating an effective system of
relations at all levels of management.
Key words: social infrastructure, agrarian sector, reform, strategy, innovations, resource potential, regional policy.
1. A better life in rural areas. Cork 2.0 declaration (2016). Available at: http: http://enrd.ec.europa.eu (Accessed 22
Januar 2018).
2. Avchukhova, A.M., Kochemirovskaya O. O. (2014). Shchodo problem rozvytku sotsialnoi infrastruktury silskykh
naselenykh punktiv. Analitychna zapyska [Concerning the problems of the development of social infrastructure of rural
settlements. Analytical note.] Available at: http://www.niss.gov.ua/articles/1132/ (Accessed 28 Januar 2018).
3. Victor, M., Villalobos, A. (2015). Development of rural territories in Central America to benefit from new geospatial
information URL: http://repiica.iica.int/DOCS/B3686i/B3686i.PDF
4. Wang, X., Jikun, H., Linxiu, Z., Scott, R. (2011). The Rise of Migration and the Fall of Self Employment in Rural
China's Labor Market. China Economic Review, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 573-584.
5. Holovne upravlinnia statystyky u Vinnytskiy oblasti [The Main Department of Statistics in Vinnytsia Oblast]. Available at: http://www.vn.ukrstat.gov.ua (Accessd 31 Januar 2018).
6. Goncharuk, I.V. (2013). Pidpryiemnytska diialnist z vyrobnytstva biopalyva yak sfera rozvytku «zelenoho biznesu»
[Business activity on biofuel production as a sphere of development of "green business"]. Ekonomichnyi forum [Economic
forum], no. 4, рр. 93-98.
7. Horyn, V.P. (2016). Problemy finansovoho zabezpechennia ahrarnoho sektoru. [Problems of financial provision of the
agrarian sector]. Ekonomika i suspilstvo. Mukachivskyi derzhavnyi universytet. [Economics and Society. Mukachevo State
University], no. 2, pp. 518-524.
8. De Janvry, A., Sadoulet, E. (2007). Toward a territorial approach to rural development. Journal of Agricultural and
Development Economics, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 66-98.
9. EU-Rural 2030. A European political strategy by 2030. Available at: http://doc.ruraleurope.org/public/Web/Communication/RED/EN/RED-Com2030-E... (Accessd 28 Februar 2018).
10. Zhibak, M.M. (2012). Do pytannia problem ta perspektyv rozvytku silskykh terytorii [On the Issues and Prospects
for the Development of Rural Areas]. Available at: http://www.economy.in.ua/pdf/5_2012/5.pdf (Accessd 01 Februar 2018).
11. Kaletnik, H.M. (2013). Naukovo-navchalno-vyrobnychyi kompleks yak kontseptsiia mekhanizmu perekhodu ahropromyslovoho vyrobnytstva na innovatsiinu model rozvytku.[ Scientific-educational production complex as a concept of the
mechanism of the transition of agricultural production to an innovative model of development] Ekonomika APK. [Economy
of agroindustrial complex], no. 9, pp. 5-11.
12. Leuba, P.A better future for Europe’s rural areas. Available at: https://rm.coe.int/a-better-future-for-europe-s-ruralareas-governance-co... (Accessd 19 October 2017).
13. Lupenko, Yu.O. (2012). Stratehichni napriamy rozvytku silskoho hospodarstva Ukrainy na period do 2020 roku
[Strategic directions of development of agriculture of Ukraine for the period till 2020]. Za red. Yu. O. Lupenka, V. Ya.
Mesel-Veseliaka [Ed. Yu. O. Lupenko, V. Ya. Mesel-Veselyak]. Kyiv, 218 p.
14. Lupenko, Yu.O. (2015). Rozvytok ahrarnoho sektoru ekonomiky Ukrainy: prohnozy ta perspektyvy.[ Development of the agrarian sector of Ukraine's economy: forecasts and perspectives]. Naukovyi visnyk Mukachivskoho
derzhavnoho universytetu. Seriia Ekonomika [Scientific herald of Mukachevo State University. Series Economics], vol. 2,
no. 4, pp. 30–34.
15. Magihovich, R. I. (2014). Stan, problemy ta perspektyvy rozvytku silskykh terytorii Zakhidnoho rehionu Ukrainy
[Status, problems and prospects of rural areas development in the Western region of Ukraine]. Available at:
http://nauka.kushnir.mk.ua/?p=75015 (Accessd 03 Januar 2018).
16. Matskiv, V. (2015). Skladovi finansovoho zabezpechennia rozvytku ahrarnoho sektoru [Components of financial
support for the development of the agrarian sector]. Stalyi rozvytok ekonomiky [Sustainable development of the economy],
no. 3, pp. 276–281.
17. Pomaz, Yu. V. (2012). Perspektyvy rozvytku silskykh terytorii Poltavskoho rehionu [Prospects for the development
of rural areas of the Poltava region]. Naukovi pratsi Poltavskoi derzhavnoi ahrarnoi akademii- Scientific Papers of the
Poltava State Agrarian Academy, no. 2 (5), рр. 232-235.
18. Mollers, Ju., Buchenrieder, G., Csaki, C. (2011). Structural Change in Agriculture and Rural Livelihoods: Policy Implications for the New Member States of the European Union. IAMO, vol. 61. Available at: http : // www.iamo.de/fileadmin/documents/sr_vol61.pdf. (Accessd 13 Januar 2018).
19. Martinez, J., Julio, C. (2008). Social quality and sustainable development of rural territories: why must sociability be
capitalized? Rural Development Technical Handbook, no. 34, 38 p.
20. Yatsenko, O.V. (2012) Stan ta perspektyvy rozvytku silskykh terytorii tsentralnoho rehionu Ukrainy [State and
prospects of development of rural territories of the central region of Ukraine]. Available at: file: /// C: /Users/user1/Downloads/econ_2012_11_8.pdf (Accessd 12 Februar 2018).
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
tomashuk_i.1-2018.pdf | 6.65 MB |