You are here
Problems of efficient land use in the context of sustainable rural development
The articles are devoted to the evaluation of the current situation in the use of land resources by agricultural producers and
to the elaboration of measures aimed to soil fertility preservation.
It is defined that the reasonable use of land resources is very important for the economics of the Ukrainian agro–industrial
complex, as soil has a number of specific peculiarities which differ it from other production means. Nowadays yields of
agricultural crops can be obtained only through the implementation of the complex approach including the enhancing of land
resources quality and use control.
A negative tendency of soil fertility decrease was defined in present conditions. The complex topsoil ecosystem is
destroyed mostly because of the erosion intensive development. The ecological situation of land use in our country has
approached to a dangerous margin which separates us from incorrigible ecological processes.
One of the reasons of this situation is a significant decrease of organic fertilizers application. For the compensation of
humus loses it is necessary to apply every year at least 10 t/ha of organic fertilizers which is impossible because of an important
decrease of livestock.
This problem can be partly solved by the use of yield part (mainly straw). Also, it is necessary to use devices of high
productivity for straw and corn stems cutting and their qualitative applying into soil. The absence of these equipments pushes
agricultural producer to burn their co–products.
It was defined that measures aimed to soil fertility increase are episodic, that is why in 90-th year the growth of valuable
highly productive agricultural holdings has stopped. The decrease of lands fertility and absence of their ameliorative
improvement, large scales and intensity of soils degradation conditions annual underperformance of 10–12 million tones of
agricultural products in grain equivalent.
It was defined that many native agricultural producers didn’t respect main agro–technical measures according to
technological cards of agricultural crops growing. Very often sowing areas structure is disturbed, scientifically justified crop
rotation is not respected, agro–ameliorative measures are not properly applied.
Nowadays the mechanisms for joining economic stimulations measures and legal responsibility in the field of land
protection as well as establishment of legally defined nature protection restrictions in lands use by boundary survey are not
sufficiently applied for the optimization of lands use and protection.
The measures of financing nature protection measures aimed to soil fertility restoration by creation of regional land
protection foundations are proposed. This foundation should be created by the allocation of some percent from land tax and fixed
agricultural tax.
The implementation of ecological tax for land users could be an alternative finances source for nature protection activity
aimed to the preservation of land resources. The scale of harm to land could constitute the base of this tax. In this relation the
government could : а) implement and to guarantee the execution of soils quality control mechanism when signing land rent
agreements; b) finance and develop agro–chemical laboratories for regularly soils condition analyses and monitoring.
Nowadays the core rotation norms look like the government intention to correct its previous mistakes with the help of
agricultural producers.
Keywords: agricultural production, land use, soil, fertility, State regulation.
1. Rossoha V.V. Ekonomichnyj potencial zemli ta problemy jogo vyznachennja v rynkovyh umovah gospodarjuvannja /
V.V. Rossoha // Transformacija zemel'nyh vidnosyn do rynkovyh umov: Zb. materialiv Odynadcjatyh richnyh zboriv Vseukrai'ns'kogo kongr. vchen. еkonomistiv-agrarnykiv, Kyi'v, 26–27 ljut. 2009 r. / Redkol.: P.T. Sabluk ta in. – K. : NNC IAE,
2009. – S.135.
2. Suchasna zemel'na polityka Ukrai'ny / A.D. Jurchenko, L.D. Grekov, A.M Miroshnychenko, A.V. Kuz'min– K.: Inter-
tehnologija, 2009. – 260 s.
3. Popadjuk O.M. Efektyvnist' vykorystannja zemel' sil's'kogospodars'kogo pryznachennja v agrarnyh pidpryjemtvah / O.M.
Popadjuk // Ekonomika APK – 2010 – № 8 – s. 135–140.
4. Sharyj G. Derzhavne upravlinnja zemljamy sil's'kogospodars'kogo pryznachennja: shho zavazhaje vysokoefektyvno
vykorystovuvaty ta nadijno ohoronjaty i'h? / G. Sharyj // Zemlevporjadnyj visnyk. – 2010. – № 5. – s. 12–19.
5. Koshkalda I.V. Efektyvnist' vykorystannja sil's'kogospodars'kyh zemel' u konteksti suchasnogo gospodarjuvannja / I.V. Kosh-
kalda // Naukovyj visnyk Nacional'nogo agrarnogo universytetu. – 2010. – № 3. – S. 228–231.
6. Gnatkovych O. D. Osoblyvosti zdijsnennja zemel'nyh vidnosyn u sil's'kogospodars'komu pidpryjemnyctvi / O. D. Gnatkovych //
Naukovyj visnyk NLTU Ukrai'ny. – 2012. – № 5 (22). – S. 195–199.
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
2015_2_stepura_ua.pdf | 277.03 KB |