You are here

Instruments of risk’s management in agriculture

Risk management structure at entities is depicted in diagram form displaying all possible instruments of risk management which by its nature belong to control or financing of the risks. Risk management system consists of three compounds: risks sources and risks itself; measures and strategy of risk management at the entity; government policy in the sphere of agriculture support.
System of risk management at the entity consists of risks’ identification; risks’ analyze and monitoring; risks’ evaluation; risks’ management; analyzing of the effectiveness of risk management at the company. Risk management has its tools (instruments), all of which may be divided into two categories: 1) control of risks; 2) financing of risks. The first mainly consists of prevention, evading and minimization of risks that preferably connected with refusal of the most risky entrepreneurial activity. The second consists of different kinds of joining and transferring of risks for payment, self-insurance (money reservation), risks’ combining (hedging, different kinds of terminal contracts) and diversification in the meaning of broadening kinds of activity and creating new projects.
More substantively the article uncovers the main instruments of agrarian risk management such as diversification, hedging and insurance which are analyzed from the position of its possible effectiveness. The author examines quantitative effectiveness analyzing methods of all mentioned above instruments of agrarian risk management. It is examined seven equations that help to find out the efficiency of relevant instrument.
In particular effectiveness of the investment project may be accounted by the next methods: net-present-value; benefit-cost ratio; internal-rate-of-return. It is also proposed equation for one of the most expensive projects – export terminal (elevator). In total, effectiveness of the investment project depends on the number of variables which may be mathematically counted. But to forecast the probability of arising any unfavorable factor in the sphere of agriculture is much harder that may lead to inexactitude of preliminary calculations.
 Effectiveness of the future contracts is defining by comparison of spot and futures market, taking into account possible currency fluctuation. The author noted that variations of futures’ prices are normally less for the spot prices, that’s why the less futures’ fluctuation, the more profitable hedging. It is of great importance to choose proper kind of terminal contracts and currency of hedging; also effectiveness of hedging depends on commodity exchange steadiness, currency fluctuations and amount of grown production.
Effectiveness of the insurance is defining by making difference between the sums of defended/created value and lost value. Under existing infirm practice of agrarian insurance it is reasonable to buy insurance polis only under certain risks and also once there is a need of credit. Besides, the most comfortable for the agrarian companies is insurance with state support, the trouble is that money subsidy pays ex post, but should be paid ex ante (in advance), that’s why insurance with state support in Ukraine now is ineffective.
In the article it is enumerated the other methods of evaluation of the effectiveness of the main risk management instruments. Effectiveness of any entity’s activity depends on proper defining of the effectiveness of risk management instruments according to the circumstances both inside the company and outside it (macro-economic indexes).
 Also it is investigated effectiveness of Ukrainian commodity exchange functioning. The author pays special attention into reduction of the quantity of contracts concluded at the commodity exchanges to 1 percent that is connected with agriculture monopolization by agro holdings, with too much commodity exchanges quantity, with low level of guarantee of contracts fulfillment and with high prices at accompanying services. The author supports scientific position of necessity to broaden independence of the small agrarians who should have a possibility to take part in the electronic commodity exchanges by themselves evading broker’s offices. The question of small and middle agro producers’ access into auctions is also considered. It is of great importance to provide appropriate infrastructure and legislation for the development of terminal contracts market with help of commodity exchanges which must have own reliable clearing centers.
Key words: instruments of risk management; diversification; hedging; insurance; commodity exchange; effectiveness analyzing methods; agrarian risk.
  1. Brin', P.V., Sirobaba, Ja.G. (2016). Porivnjannja metodiv ocinjuvannja efektyvnosti investycijnyh proektiv [Comparison of investment projects evaluation methods].Visnyk Nacional'nogo tehnichnogo universytetu «KPI». Serija : Aktual'ni problemy rozvytku ukrai'ns'kogo suspil'stva [Bulletin of National technical university “KPI”. Series: Actual problems of Ukrainian society development], no. 13, pp. 71-72.
  2. Vasylenko, N.K. (2014). Metody vyznachennja efektyvnosti zastosuvannja instrumentiv hedzhuvannja [Methods of hedging instrument effectiveness calculation]. Ekonomichnyj analiz [Economic analysis]. Vol. 16(1), pp. 174-180.
  3. Golubjev, D.I. (2015). Osoblyvosti ryzyku ta nevyznachenosti pry ocinci efektyvnosti upravlinnja investycijnyh proektiv [Peculiarities of risk and uncertainty under investment projects management estimation]. Visnyk Zaporiz'kogo nacional'nogo universytetu. Ekonomichni nauky [Bulletin of Zaporizhia’ national university. Economic sciences], no. 2,
    pp. 17-26.
  4. Il'chuk, M.M., Konoval, I.A. (2015). Efektyvnist' investycijnogo proektu stvorennja i funkcionuvannja vysokotehnologichnogo sil's'kogospodars'kogo pidpryjemstva [Effectiveness of investment project of creation and functioning of high-technology agrarian entity]. Ekonomika APK [Agrarian economics], no. 5, pp. 55-68.
  5. Kyryljuk, Je.M. (2015). Rozvytok birzhovoi' torgivli sil's'kogospodars'koju produkcijeju v Ukrai'ni [Development of agrarian exchange in Ukraine]. Visnyk Cherkas'kogo universytetu. Serija «Ekonomichni nauky» [Bulletin of Chercasy’ university. Series: “Economic sciences”], no. 12 (345), pp.46-53.
  6. Lobova, O. (2014). Efektyvnist' strahuvannja ryzykiv pidpryjemnyc'koi' dijal'nosti v agrarnomu sektori [Effectiveness of insurance of risks in entrepreneurial activity in the agriculture]. Visnyk Kyi'vs'kogo nacional'nogo universytetu imeni Tarasa Shevchenka.Ekonomika [Bulletin of Kyiv Taras Shevchenko national university. Economics]. Issue 3, pp. 70-76.
  7. Mihajlov, A.Ju. (2012). Metody ocenki hedzhirovanija na osnove standarta SFAS 133 [Methods of hedging evaluation on the basis of SFAS 133]. Finansovaja analitika: problemy i reshenija [Finance analytics: problems and decisions],
    no. 26, pp. 40-44.
  8. Mozhyrovs'ka, Z.G. (2013). Analiz efektyvnosti investycijnyh proektiv v umovah ryzyku [Analysis of effectiveness of investment projects under risk conditions]. Naukovyj visnyk NPTU Ukrai'ny [Scientific bulletin NPTU of Ukraine],
    no. 23.14, pp. 318-321.
  9. Nychyporuk O. Ju. (2001). Perspektyvy rozvytku strahuvannja vrozhaju sil'gospkul'tur [Perspectives of agrarian crops insurance development]. Propozycija [Proposition], no. 4, pp.28-29.
  10. Sachenko, O.A. (2015). Metod ocinky efektyvnosti investycij innovacijnogo proektu modernizacii' obladnannja [Method of evaluation of effectiveness of innovation equipment modernization project]. Visnyk Nacional'nogo tehnichnogo universytetu «KPI». Serija: Strategichne upravlinnja, upravlinnja portfeljamy, programamy ta proektamy [Bulletin of National technical university “KPI”. Series: Strategy management, portfolio management, programmes and projects management], no. 1, pp. 179-182.
  11. Olijnyk, O.V., Ksendzuk, V.V. (2015). Ocinka efektyvnosti hedzhuvannja: problemy oblikovo-analitychnogo zabezpechennja [Hedging effectiveness evaluation: problems of accounting and analytic supplement]. Ekonomika: realii' chasu [Economics: reality of time], no. 1, pp. 265-271.
  12. Omarova, Z.N. (2015). Sil'naja kul'tura upravlenija riskami kak neotemlemyj jelement sistemy risk-menedzhmenta [Strong culture of risks’ management as an inalienable part of risk management system]. Fundamental'nye issledovanija [Fundamental researches], no. 2-11, pp. 21-24.
  13. Osadcha, G.G., D'jakova, N. I. (2015). Porivnjal'nyj analiz metodiv ocinjuvannja efektyvnosti investycijnyh proektiv [Comparative analysis of investment projects effectiveness evaluation]. Visnyk Odes'kogo nacional'nogo universytetu. Serija: Ekonomika [Bulletin of Odessa’ national university. Series: Economics]. Vol. 20, Issue 5, pp. 265-270.
  14. Prokopchuk, O.T., Uljanych, Ju.V., Bechko V.P. (2014). Osoblyvosti strahuvannja agrarnyh ryzykiv u krai'nah svitu [Peculiarities of agrarian insurance in different countries]. Aktual'ni problemy ekonomiky [Actual problems of economics], no. 13, pp. 46-53.
  15. Ukrai'ns'ka birzha. Pidsumky torgiv [Ukrainian commodity exchange. Bidding results]. Available at: http://www.ux.ua/ua/marketdata/marketresults.aspx (Accepted 20 December 2017).
  16. Hodyrev, I.O. (2012). Ocenka jeffektivnosti risk-menedzhmenta jekonomicheskoj bezopasnosti na mikrourovne [Evaluation of the effectiveness of economic security risk management in the microlevel]. Voprosy jekonomiki i prava [Economics and law questions], no. 2, pp. 237-240.
  17. Chernata, T.M., Sinjenko, I.O. (2014). Ocinka efektyvnosti investycijnyh proektiv za kryterijem chystogo pryvedenogo dohodu [Valuation of effectiveness of investment projects by criterion for pure indicated revenue]. Finansy Ukrai'ny [Finance of Ukraine], no. 10, pp. 109-118.
  18. Jakos', I.S. (2009). Strahovanie i samostrahovanie predprinimatel'skih riskov: sushhnost' i sravnitel'naja ocenka [Insurance and self-insurance of entrepreneurial risk: nature and comparative analysis]. Visnyk Hmel'nyc'kogo nacional'nogo universytetu [Bulletin of Chmelnitsky’ national university], no. 4, Vol. 2, pp. 243-248.
  19. Jares'ko R.S. (2013). Sutnist' ta klasyfikacija ryzykiv investycijnoi' dijal'nosti energetychnyh pidpryjemstv [Nature and classification of risks of energetic companies investment activity]. Ekonomichna nauka. Investycii': praktyka i dosvid [Economics. Investments: practice and experience], no. 20, pp. 62-64.
  20. Chung-Chu Chuang, Yi-Hsien Wang, Tsai-Jung Yeh & Sho-Li Chuang Hedging Effectiveness of the Hedged Portfolio : the Expected Utility Maximization subject to the Value-at-Risk Approach. Applied Economics, 27 January, 2015,
    Vol. 47, Issue 20, pp. 2040-2052.
  21. Crockford G.N. The Bibliography and History of Risk Management: Some Preliminary Observations. The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance, 23 April, 1982. No 7. pp. 169-179.
  22. Hong V. Nguyen Hedging and Hedging Effectiveness under Required disclosures: a Study of the Impact of Derivatives Use on Capital Investment. Journal of Economics and Finance, 17 June, 2017, pp. 1-21.
  23. Miyakawa T., Nakamuva H., Umezaki S. (2013). Study for Evaluation Index of Investment Effectiveness for Machine and Manufacturing System Includes Protection Measures. Advanced Materials Research. Vol. 320, pp. 314-318.
  24. Rudzikiene J, Adomaitiene R. & Sirvidaite J. (2015). Motivation and efficiency of quality management systems implementation: a study of Lithuanian organizations. Total quality management & business excellence. Vol. 15 (2), pp. 173-189.
  25. Stoll H., Whaley R. (1993) Futures and Options: Theory and Applications. South-Western Publishing Company. Cincinnati. 203 p.
AttachmentSize
PDF icon yudin_v.1-2018.pdf7.71 MB