You are here
Efficacy of human resources management practices on the performance of small and medium scale enterprises
Human Resources Management Practices (HRM) is recognized as being essential to the success of Small and Medium Scale Enterprises (SMEs). The objectives of this research was to examine the effect of human resource management practices on SMEs growth in Ogun State and also to determine the adoption of human resource management practices on performance of SMEs. The primary data was gathered using structured questionnaire. The survey method was used and a cross-sectional design was adopted. Selected SMEs in the two local government area of Abeokuta (Abeokuta South LGA), and (Abeokuta North LGA) were object of the study. The data was analyzed using statistical package for the social sciences, (SPSS). It also made use of analysis of variance (ANOVA), Simple linear regression analysis was used to test hypotheses one and correlation analysis was employed to test hypothesis two. The study indicatesthat Human resources management practices is a significant predictor of SMEs in Ogun state and there is a significant effect between Adoption of HRM practices and SMEs performance in Abeokuta, Ogun state. The study recommended that Organization need to have an effective recruitment policy to promote scientific selection of prospective employees. The departments should participate in selection process as they have different preferences in the candidates. Candidates need to be selected based on requisite skills knowledge, attitude and qualification using appropriate selection techniques.
Key words: HRM, SMEs Performance, SMEs Growth.
REFERENCES
1. Adams, J. (2020). HR in all its glory. Human Resource Management International Digest, 15(5), 3 – 6.
2. Aguinis, N. and Kraiger, E. (2019). The impact of strategic human resourcemanagement on organizational performance. Journal Naval Science Engineering, 6(2): 100-116.
3. Armstrong, R. (2016). Learned industriousness. Psychological Review, 99, 248–267.
4. Arthur, M. (2018) Managing human resources in small organizations: What do we know; Journal of Human Resource Management Review. 14, p. 295−323.
5. Ayesh, D. (2019). Self-fulfilling prophecies in organizations. In J. Greenberg (Ed.), Organizational behavior: The state of the science (2nd ed., pp. 91–122).
6. Bailey, B. (2017). Mere presence effects in humans: A review. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 38–77.
7. Boudreau, E. (2015). A confirmatory structural equations analysis of the job characteristics model. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 39, 242–263.
8. Boxall, Purcel and Wright (2017). The impact of human resources management practices on turnover, productivity and corporate financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 58:635-672.
9. Brewster, R. (2020). Objective and social sources of information in task redesign: A field experiment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28, 184– 200.
10. Campbell, A. (2019). Fundamentals of Organizational Behavior (4th editions). US: South-Western College Pub. Journal of Management, 44: 23-33.
11. Caruth, N. and Handlogten, D. (2018). The interactive effects of task variety, autonomy, and feedback on attitudes and performance. Journalof Organizational Behavior, 17, 329–347.
12. Deming, O., (2017). Gross job creation, Gross job description and employment Reallocation. Quality Journal of Economic, 107(3): 819-963
13. Dessler, Z. (2019). Impact of human resource practices on employee perceived performance in banking sector of Pakistan. African Journal of Business Management, 6(1), 323-332.
14. Frese, P., and Zapf, H. (2018). Human Resources Management. 7th Edition. Cape Town: Oxford Southern Africa.
15. Frye, W., (2016), ―The Relationship between Human Resource Practices & Employee Retention in Public Organizations: An Exploratory Study Conducted in the UAE‖, Edith Cowan University.
16. Goldstein, C., and Ford, S. (2019). Achieving Organizational excellence through the performance measurement system: Consortium benchmarking study-best practice report. Houston, TX: American Productivity Center.
17. Griffin, R. (2020). Objective and social factors as determinants of task perceptions and responses: An integrated perspective and empirical investigation. Academyof Management Journal, 30, 501–523.
18.Grossman, M. and Salas, H. A., (2021). The Effect of Human Resources Planning, Training and Development on Organizational Performance in the Government Sector in Jordan, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Vol. 4: 4.
19.Guzzo, P., Jette, G and Katzell, J. (2020), ― Economics, organization and management‖, London: Prentice-Hall International.
20. Hackman, H. (2019). Human Resource Management, Singapore‖. Thomson Asia Pte .Ltd. Journal of Human Resources, 4: 21-29.
21. Heras, J. (2016). Social relationships: The nature and function of relational schemas. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 447–495.
22. Hill, C. (2018). Work motivation theory and research at the dawn of the twenty-first century. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 495–516.
23. Hoffman, J. E., Hofmann, D. A., & Farr, J. L. (2020). Job perception—job satisfaction relations: An empirical comparison of three competing theories. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 56, 370–387.
24. Holbeche, J. (2017). Ten difference score myths. Organizational Research Methods, 4, 265–287.
25. Huselid, V., (2019). "Recruitment and Selection in Chinese MNEs", International Journal of Human Resource Management, Vol. 15, No. 4, pp. 814-835.
26. Kaplan, M. (2018). Equity‐based compensation for employees: firm performance and determinants. Journal of Financial Research, 27(1), 31-54.
27. Kate, S. (2016). Social loafing: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration. Journal of Personality and SocialPsychology, 65, 681–706.
28. Kaynak, G. (2015). Mediating and moderating effects in job design. Journal of Management, 18, 657–676.
29. Kor, M., and Sundaramorthy, K. (2019). Impact and the art of motivation maintenance: The effects of contact with beneficiaries on persistence behavior. Organizational Behaviorand Human Decision Processes, 103, 53–67.
30. Korosawa, R. (2016). Development of the Job Diagnostic Survey. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 159–170.
31. Lee, C. (2017). Strategic Human Resources Practices and Top Management Team Social Networks: An Examination of the Role of HR Practices in Creating Organizational Competitive Advantage.
Academy of Management Journal, 46(6), 740-752.
32. Lowry, Simon and Kimberley (2016). Organizational culture and employee relation, Academy of Management Journal, England, 35: 1036-1056
33. Macky, D. and Johnson, S. (2019). Warrior Politics: Why Leadership Demands a Pagan Ethos. American Journal of Sociology, 98, 451–468.
34. Marques, M. (2017). Impact of HR practices on perceived performance of university teachers in Pakistan. International review of business research papers, 4(2), 302-315.
35. Monday, A. (2018). Facet scales for agreeableness and conscientiousness: A revision of the NEO Personality Inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 12, 887–898.
36. Mongo, J. (2015). The uniqueness paradox in organizational stories. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28, 438–453.
37. Pitfield, D. (2016). A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 7, 83–104.
38. Scatterfield, T. and Hughes, R. (2017). Relationship of personality to performance motivation: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87:797–807.
39. Tsavr, S. and Lin, R. (2018). Effects of task difficulty and task uniqueness on social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 1214–1229.
40. Vroom, W. (2019). Rational self-interest and other orientation in organizational behavior: A critical appraisal and extension of organization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 1245–1252.
41. Wright, (2015). Human Resource Management, Thomson Asia Ltd. Journal of Human Resources, 3: 43-58.
42. Yalokwu, J. (2020). Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance,16, 250–279.
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
![]() | 485.24 KB |