You are here
Tax burden of food industry companies of Ukraine
The tax burden determines the payment of taxes by the market subject to various budgets and serves as the basis for verification by the State Tax Service. The corporate income tax rate, which is equal to 18% in Ukraine, is called normative. The effective tax rate can be determined from the standpoint of macroeconomic analysis of the tax burden for the industry and from the standpoint of microeconomic analysis of the tax burden for individual enterprises. It is relevant to study the effective tax burden of food industry enterprises, which form significant shares of GDP and tax payments in the consolidated budget of the country.
The purpose of the study is a microeconomic analysis of the influence of factors on the effective tax rate of food industry companies of Ukraine and the verification of the hypothesis about the degree of deviation of the effective rate from the normative tax rate of food enterprises.
Methodology. The methods of generalization, descriptive statistics and systematization, factor and correlation-regression analyses are used in the investigation. Economic and statistical analysis was carried out using Microsoft Office software packages.
The results. An algorithm for calculating the effective corporate tax rate is proposed. The list of financial operations at food enterprises of Ukraine, which produce a change in the financial result before taxation, is determined. It was revealed that in recent years the effective tax burden approaches to the normative tax rate, 18%.
A methodology of microeconomic calculations was developed for assessing the tax burden of a company based on indicator-factors, including: company assets, income from product sales, number of employees, share of liabilities in assets, share of tangible assets in assets, share of current assets in assets, profitability of assets and equity capital, labor intensity, growth rate of real GDP. Correlations between the effective tax rate and the factors are determined. The largest number of influencing factors and the number of correlations are obtained for four enterprises of the sample: private joint stock companies "Mondelis Ukraine", "Lagoda Confectionery Factory", "Rivne confectionery factory", "Kharkiv biscuit factory".
Key words: tax burden, tax return, normative tax rate, effective tax rate, food industry enterprises, factoranalysis, correlation analysis.
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8349-2113REFERENCES
1. Podatkovyi kodeks Ukrainy vid 02.12.2010 № 2755-VI. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/ show/2755-17/
2. Storozhuk, O. V., Panura, Yu. V. (2013). Podatok na prybutok pidpryiemstv: vitchyznianyi ta zarubizhnyi dosvid [Corporate income tax: domestic and foreign experience]. Naukovyi visnyk Natsionalnoho universytetu derzhavnoi podatkovoi sluzhby Ukrainy (ekonomika, pravo) [Scientific bulletin of the National University of the State Tax Service of Ukraine (economics, law)] , no. 3, рр. 191-196.
3. CASE Ukraine. Podatky v Ukraini vs krainy YeS: de platiat bilshe?Available at: https://cost.ua/714- podatky-v-ukrayini-vs-krayiny-eu-de-platyat-bilshe/.
4. European Commission. Direct taxes – Corporate Income Tax. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/taxation_ customs/tedb/taxDetails.html?id=25/1640991600.
5. Buijink, W., Janssen, B., Schols, Y. (2002). Evidence of the effect of domicile on corporate average effective tax rates in the European Union, Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 11, pp. 115-130.
6. Statutory and Effective Corporate Tax Rates. Available at: https://www.compareyourcountry.org/ corporate-tax-statistics.
7. Murphy, C. (2016). Efficiency of the tax system: a marginal excess burden analysis. Working Paper 4/2016. Available at: https://taxpolicy.crawford.anu.edu.au/publication/ttpi-working-papers/77....
8. Overesch, M. (2005). The Effective Tax Burdenof Companies in Europe. CESifo DICE Report, Vol. 03, Iss. 4, pp. 56-63.
9. Helcmanovská, M., Andrejovská, A. (2021). Tax Rates and Tax Revenues in the Context of Tax Competitiveness. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 14: 284. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/ jrfm14070284.
10. Šimoviæ, H. (2009). Effective Corporate Income Tax Burden in Croatia. Zagreb International Review of Economics and Business, vol. 12, issue 2, pp. 107-121.
11. Bubanić, M., Šimović, H. (2021). Determinants of the effective tax burden of companies in the Telecommunications activities in the Republic of Croatia. Zagreb International Review of Economics & Business, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 59-76. Available at: https://doi. org/10.2478/zireb-2021-0011.
12. Goddard, J., Tavakoli, M., Wilson, J. (2005). Determinants of profitability in European manufacturing and services: Evidence from a dynamic panel data. Applied Financial Economics, 15 (18), рр. 1269–1282. Available at: DOI: 10.1080/09603100500387139.
13. Wing, C., Yiu, M. (1997). Firm size and performance of manufacturing enterprises in P. R. China: The case of Shanghai´s manufacturing industries. Small Business Economics, 9 (3), рр. 287-298.
14. Meijaard, J., Brand, M., & Mosselman, M. (2005). Organizational structure and performance in Dutch small firms. Small Business Economics, 25 (1), рр. 83-96. Available at: DOI: 10.1007/s11187-005- 4259-7.
15. Carreras, M., Dachapalli, C., Mascagni, G. (2017). Effective corporate tax burden and firm size in South Africa: A firm-level analysis. WIDER Working Paper 2017/162. Available at: https://www.wider.unu. edu/sites/default/files/Publications/Working-paper/ PDF/wp2017-162.pdf.
16. Bachas, P., Brockmeyer, A., Dom, R., Semelet, C.
(2022). Effective tax rates and firm size: the case of100 Ethiopia. World Bank: Development Research Group; Macro, Trade & Investment Global Practice January 2022. Available at: https://www.taxdev.org/sites/ default/files/2022-02/TaxDev_Effective_Tax_Rates_ Ethiopia_0.pdf.
17. Shin, Y., Park, J. (2022). Differences in Tax Avoidance According to Corporate Sustainability with a Focus on Delisted Firms. Sustainability, 14, 6648. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14116648.
18. Lemishko, O. O. (2016). Rehuliuiuchyi vplyv podatkovoho navantazhennia na ekonomichni protsesy u silskomu hospodarstvi [Regulatory influence of the tax burden on economic processes in agriculture]. Molodyi vchenyi [Young scientist], no. 9, pp. 54-60.
19. Boiko, S., Nehrey, M., Davydenko, N., Karbivskyi, V. (2023). Tax Sustainability in Ukraine: A Case of Agricultural Companies. Economies, 11:6. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/economies11010006.
20. Kontseva, V., Antonenko, N., Karlova, I. (2021). Oblikovo-analitychne zabezpechennia otsinky podatkovoho navantazhennia pidpryiemstva [Accounting and analytical support for assessing the tax burden of the enterprise]. Ekonomika ta suspilstvo [Economy and society], (29). Available at: https://doi. org/10.32782/2524-0072/2021-29-12.
21. Yefimenko, T. I., Sokolovska, A. M. and etc. (2013). Dynamika podatkovoho navantazhennia v Ukraini v konteksti realizatsii podatkovoi reform [Dynamics of the tax burden in Ukraine in the context of the implementation of the tax reform]. Kyiv: Academy of Financial Management, 494 p.
22. Shіrіnyan, L., Arych, M. (2019). Impact of the insurance costs on the competitiveness of food industry enterprises of Ukraine in the context of the food market security. Ukrainian Food Journal. 8 (2), pp. 368-385.
23. Valovyi vnutrishnii produkt (1990-2021). Available at: https://ukrstat.gov.ua/.
24. Obsiah realizovanoi produktsii (tovariv, posluh) subiektiv hospodariuvannia za vydamy ekonomichnoi diialnosti (2010-2021). Available at: https:// ukrstat.gov.ua./
25. Jacobs, O. H., Spengel, C. (1999). The Effective Average Tax Burden in the European Union and the USA: A Computer-Based Calculation and Comparison with the Model of the European Tax Analyzer (September 1999). ZEW Discussion Paper, no. 99-54. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.376221.
26. Nurwati, Prastio, Nawang Kalbuana. (2021). Influence of firms size, exchange rate, profitability and tax burden on transfer pricing. International Journal of Economics, Business and Accounting Research. Peer Reviewed – International Journal, vol. 5, iss. 3, pp. 967-980.
27. F Dwi Noviastika, Yuniadi Mayoman, dan Suhartini Karjo. (2016). Pengaruh Pajak, Tunneling Incentive dan Good Corporate Governance (GCG) Terhadap Indikasi Melakukan Transfer Pricing pada Peerusahaan Manufaktur yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia (Studi pada Bursa Efek Indonesia yang Berkaitan dengan Perusahaan Asing. Jurnal Perpajakan, 8 (1), рр. 1–9.
28. Blechová, B., Barteczková, I. (2008). Comparison of the methodologies for assessing effective tax burden of corporate income used in European Union. Slezska Univerzita-Obchodne podnikatelska Fakulta University of Silesia-School of Business Administration 22 May 2008. Available at: https://mpra.ub.unimuenchen.de/17822/.
29. Lazar, S. (2010). Effective Tax Burden Borne By Companies: A Review And A New Methodology. Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1 (2), pр. 584-588.
30. Leonova, A. V., Chernenok, K. P. (2017). Vplyv podatkovoho navantazhennia na finansovyi stan pidpryiemstv molochnoi haluzi [The impact of the tax burden on the financial condition of dairy enterprises]. Molodyi vchenyi [Young scientist], no. 11, pp. 1224-1229.
31. Novoselska, L. I. (2013). Metody otsiniuvannia rivnia podatkovoho navantazhennia pidpryiemstv [Methods of assessing the level of tax burden of enterprises]. Naukovyi visnyk NLTU Ukrainy [Scientific Bulletin of National Technical University of Ukraine], vol. 23.10, pp. 239-244.
32. Kalabukhova, S. V. (2018). Analiz podatkovoi efektyvnosti subiekta hospodariuvannia [Analysis of tax efficiency of a business entity]. Ekonomichnyi analiz [Economic analysis], Tom 28, no. 4, pp. 193-199.
33. Alieksieiev, I. V., Paranchuk, S. V., Chervinska, O. S., Syniutka, N. H. (2016). Upravlinnia podatkovym navantazhenniam pidpryiemstv [Management of the tax burden of enterprises]. Rehionalna ekonomika [Regional economy], no. 4, рр. 145-152.
34. Statistical Publication «National Accounts of Ukraine». Available at: https://ukrstat.gov
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
 shirinian_87-101.pdf | 838.69 KB |