You are here
Methodological approaches to research the efficiency of social infrastructure management in rural territories
The article examines the factors that influence the sustainability of the agricultural enterprise, as well as approaches to determining the vector of their influence on achieving sustainability and developing practical recommendations for strengthening (weakening) their action. It is substantiated that ensuring the stable functioning of agricultural enterprises in conditions of martial law requires the search for new approaches to achieving sustainability. The author’s approach to interpreting the sustainable development of an enterprise involves its stable acquisition of a new quality, which is manifested in a balanced change in subsystems - economic, social, environmental, which ensure the achievement of sustainability based on the use of innovations.
It is proven that the condition for achieving sustainability by the agricultural enterprise is the stability of its development, which is considered as a tool for ensuring sustainability. It is concluded that small and medium-sized agricultural enterprises do not have sufficient adaptive capabilities to the conditions of the external environment, which makes it difficult for them to achieve sustainability.
It is argued that the internal factors that influence the achievement of sustainability by the agricultural enterprise, unlike external ones, are subjective and most of them are subject to quantitative assessment. It is argued that the quality of the management process of an agricultural enterprise is one of the factors of the external environment that influences its achievement of sustainability. Indicators of management quality assessment are highlighted, which should be taken into account in the system of the most influential factors on the achievement of sustainability by an enterprise.
The internal social factors that influence the sustainability of an agricultural enterprise include the following: the level of quality of employees life, the level of social security, indicators of staff turnover, the qualitative structure of employees by education, age, etc. The most important environmental indicators for ensuring the sustainability of the agricultural enterprise are highlighted, among which are: compliance with crop rotation, rational use of fertilizers, protection of fields (plantations), maintenance of ecological and landscape systems of agriculture, alternative agricultural production, technologies for the use and disposal of by-products, etc. It is substantiated that the transition of an agricultural enterprise to the principles of sustainable development occurs provided that it achieves sustainable development and economic growth of the main resulting indicators.
Key words: sustainable development, agricultural enterprise, external factors, internal factors, sustainability, models of sustainable development, qualitative economic growth.
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4453-8905REFERENCES
1. Ponomarenko, V. S., Hontareva, I. V. (2015). Metodolohiia kompleksnoho otsiniuvannia efektyvnosti rozvytku pidpryiemstv: monohrafii [Methodology of comprehensive evaluation of the efficiency of enterprise development: monograph]. 404 p. Available at: http://repository.hneu.edu.ua/ jspui/bitstream/123456789/11912/1/pdf
2. Honta, S. V. (2019). Naukovi pidkhody ta metody analizu sotsialnoi infrastruktury rehionivUkrainy [Scientific approaches and methods of analyzing the social infrastructure of regions of Ukraine]. Biznes inform. No. 1. 151-155 pp.
3. Hrechyna, I. (2010). Systemnyi pidkhid yak metodolohichna osnova doslidzhennia potentsialuekonomichnykh system [System approach as a methodological basis for studying the potential ofeconomic systems]. Ekonomichnyi analiz [Economic analysis]. Issue. 7. 15-18 pp. Available at: https:// econa.at.ua/Vypusk_7/grechyna.pdf
4. Brych, V., Borysiak, O., Bilous, L., Halysh, N. (2020). Transformatsiia sysemy upravlinniapersonalom pidpryiemstv: monohrafiia [Transformation of the personnel management system of enterprises: monograph]. Ternopil: VPTs «Ekonomichna dumku TNEU» [«Economic Thought of TNEU»]. 212 p.
5. Halaida, T. O., Oleshko, K. V. (2022). Formuvannia kompleksnoi systemy otsiniuvannia personalu na osnovi kompetentnisnoho pidkhodu [Formation of a comprehensive personnel assessment system based on a competency-based approach].Skhidna Yevropa: ekonomika, biznes ta upravlinnia [Eastern Europe: Economics, Business and Management]. No. 34. 61-68 pp.
6. Hordiienko, V. M. (2024). Upravlinnia sotsialnoiu sferoiu v konteksti rozvytku terytorialnykh hromad Ukrainy: analiz teoretychnykh kontseptsii ta perspektyvy [Management of the social sphere in the context of the development of territorial communities of Ukraine: analysis of theoretical concepts and prospects]. Vcheni zapysky TNU imeni V.I. Vernadskoho. Seriia: Publichne upravlinnia ta administruvannia [Academic notes of V. I. Vernadsky TNU. Series: Public management and administration]. No. 4. Vol. 35 (74). DOI https://doi.org/10.32782/ TNU-2663-6468/2024.4/10
7. Varchenko, O. M., Danylenko, A. S., Krysanov, D. F. (2016). Kontseptualni osnovy staloho rozvytku ahrosfery: navch. posibnyk [Conceptual foundations of sustainable development of the agrosphere: textbook]. BNAU. Bila Tserkva. 184 p.
8. Danylenko, A. S., Varchenko, O. M., Krysanov, D. F., ets. (2020). Silskyi sektor Kyivskoi oblasti v umovakh suspilnykh transformatsii: kolektyvna monohrafiia [The rural sector of the Kyiv region in the context of social transformations: a collective monograph]. Bila Tserkva: BNAU. 310 p.
9. Bortnyk, N. P., Dniprov, O. S. (2017). Problemy otsinky yakosti ta efektyvnosti diialnosti orhaniv vykonavchoi vlady [Problems of assessing the quality and effectiveness of the activities of executive bodies].128 Aktualni problemy vidchyznianoiu yurysprundentsii [Current problems of foreign jurisprudence]. No. 6. Vol. 3. 80–84 pp.
10. Nosan, N. S., Kusiaka, M. O. (2021). Otsinka efektyvnosti diialnosti orhaniv mistsevoho samovriaduvannia [Assessment of the effectiveness of the activities of local self-government bodies]. Ekonomika ta suspilstvo [Economy and Society]. No. 26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2021-26-57
11. Pakulina, A. A., Pakulin, S. L., Tarasenko, S. I. (2016). Teoretyko-metodolohichni zasady efektyvnoho rozvytku sotsialnoho kompleksu v umovakh hlobalizatsii ta yevrointehratsiinoho vektora Ukrainy [Theoretical and methodological principles of effective development of the social complex in the context of
globalization and the European integration vector of Ukraine]. Mykolaivskyi natsionalnyi universytet imeni V.O. Sukhomlynskoho [Mykolaiv National University named after V.O. Sukhomlynsky]. Vol.10. 214-219 pp.
12. Krupa, V. R., Martyniuk, N. V. (2013). Riven zhyttia silskoho naselennia u konteksti formuvannia umov dlia liudskoho rozvytku [The standard of living of the rural population in the context of the formation of conditions for human development]. Ahrosvit. No. 24. 18-24 pp.
13. Poplavska, O. M., Shevchuk, O. V. (2020). Yakist zhyttia silskoho naselennia: problemy,perspektyvy pokrashchennia [The quality of life of the rural population: problems, prospects for improvement]. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats Ekonomichnyi prostir [Collection of scientific works. Economic space]. Issue (159). 141-146 pp. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2224-6282/159-29
14. Prytula, Kh. M. (2014). Yakist zhyttia naselennia yak osnovna determinanta rozvytku silskykh terytorii [The quality of life of the population as the main determinant of the development of rural areas]. Sotsialno-ekonomichni problemy suchasnoho periodu Ukrainy [Socio-economic problems of the modern period of Ukraine]. Issue 3. 408-417 pp.
15. Pohorielova, O. (2022). Vplyv mihratsii na prodovolchu bezpeku ta silske hospodarstvo [The impact of migration on food security and agriculture]. Ekonomika ta suspilstvo [Economy and society]. Issue. (37). DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2022-37-14
16. Pyvovar, P. V., Pyvovar, A. M. (2022). Suchasnyi stan rozvytku liudskoho kapitalu silskykh terytorii Ukrainy [The current state of human capital development in rural areas of Ukraine]. Ekonomika ta suspilstvo [Economy and society]. Vol. 38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2022-38-13
17. Vytvytska, U. Ya. (2021). Otsinka efektyvnosti sotsialnykh investytsii [Assessment of the effectiveness of social investments]. Ekonomika ta derzhava [Economy and state]. No. 5. 97-101 pp.
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
 paska_119-128.pdf | 1.34 MB |