You are here
Motivating component in the remote form of employment of the staff
Conditions of innovative development of economy make significant changes in the system of social – labor relations, their new forms appear, which accompany the transition of social – labor relations from collectively – contractual to more individual and socially vulnerable. In this regard, new challenges are emerging for the whole system of regulation of social and labor relations. The most significant form of manifestation of changes in this area of social relations is remote social – labor relations, which focus on providing the ability to perform work responsibilities without being in the workplace due to modern technologies. Compared to our country, telework is well developed in foreign countries.
Foreign companies have already experienced the benefits of remote employment: saving time to get to work, solving transport problems, reducing environmental tensions, reducing unemployment, increasing time for family communication and leisure.
The concept of remote employment, the main problems of this form of employment and ways of their solution, practical application of it in modern organizations, all advantages and disadvantages of working in a remote format are analyzed. The prospect of further spread of remote employment in the country, methods of motivation of workers working remotely were evaluated.
The peculiarities of personnel management with regard to remote employment in organizations were identified and a strategy for remote employment management was proposed, which would allow to understand the problems related to remote work, which management needed to solve: finding the right balance between work and personal life, overcoming isolation at work in place, compensation for lack of personal communication and compensation for lack of employee visibility. Ways to increase the efficiency of work of remote employees, motivate them to work, as well as increase their level of adaptation in the company and involvement in the workforce.
Key words: motivation, control, personnel, remote work, flexible work, flexible schedule, remote work, innovation.
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4112-618X1.Bandura S.I. (2014). Rozvytok socialno-trudovyh vidnosyn yak peredumova dosjagnennja produktyvnoi zajnjatosti naselennja [Developmentof social-labor relationsas a prerequisite for achieving productive employment of the population]. Rynok praci ta zajnjatist naselennja, no.1, pp. 8–13.
2. Gnybidenko I.F., Rusnak A.D. (2014). Transformacija rynku praci na seli: perspektyvy optymizacii neformalnoi zajnjatosti silskogo naselennja [Transformation of the rurallabor market: prospects for optimizingin formal rural employment]. Ekonomika Ukrainy, no. 4, pp. 83–93. Available at: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/EkUk_2014_4_8.
3. GrishnovaO.A., MishhukG.Ju. (2013). Socialni innovacii u trudovij sferi: sutnist, vydy, osoblyvosti realizacii v Ukraini [Social innovations in the labor sphere: essence, types, features of realization in Ukraine]. Demografija ta socialna ekonomika, no. 2, pp. 167–178. Available at: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/dse_2013_2_18.
4. Zajac T.A. (2015). Strategichnyj otencial produktyvnyh syl regioniv Ukrainy: problem formuvannja ta vykorystannja [Strategic potential of productive forces of Ukrainian regions: problems of formation and use]. Ekonomika i region, no. 3, pp. 55–59. Available at: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/econrig_2015_3_11.
5. Kiryan T.M., Shapoval M.S. (2015). Vyznachennja vplyvu riznomanitnyh vydiv, form zajnjatosti ta bezrobittja naselennja na stan nacionalnogo rynku praci [Determining the impact of various types, forms of employment and unemployment on the state of the national labor market]. Visnyk ekonomichnoi nauky Ukrainy, no. 1, pp. 72–81. Available at: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Venu_2015_1_17.
6. Kolot A. (2007). Innovacijna pracja ta intelektualnyj kapital u systemi faktoriv formuvannja ekonomiky znan [Innovative labor and intellectual capital in the system of factors of knowledge economy formation]. Ukraina: aspektypraci, no. 4, pp. 4–9.
7. Kolot A. (2009), Transformacija instytutuzajnjatosti yak skladova globalnyh zmin u socialno-trudovijsferi [Transformation of the Employment Institute as a Component of Global Changes in the Social and Labor Sphere]. Ukraina: aspektypraci, no. 8, pp. 3–14.
8. Makarova M. (2006). Dystancijna zajnjatist v umovah rozvytku merezhevoi ekonomiky [Remote employment in the conditions of development of network economy]. Ekonomika ta derzhava, no.1, pp. 80–87.
9. Troshyna T. (2012). Netypovi formy zajnjatosti: ryzyky dlja pracivnykiv ta neobhidnist pravovogo reguljuvannja [Atypical forms of employment: risks foremployees and the need for legalregulation]. NSPP, viddilennjav Luganskijobl. Available at: http://nspp-lugansk.ucoz.ua/publ/netipovi_formi_zajnjatosti_riziki_dlja_....
10. Motorna I.I. (2009). Socialno-trudovividnosyny: formuvannjatarozvytok [Social-labor relations: formation and development], avtoref. dys. kand. ekon. nauk: spec[the abstract of the dissertation of the candidate of economic sciences: special]. Kyiv, p. 20.
11. Vapnjarchuk N. (2016), Dystancijna zajnjatist: problem pravovogo reguljuvannja [Remote employment: problems of legal regulation]. Pravo ta innovacii, no.13, p. 101.
12. Motorna I. (2008), Dystancijna zajnjatist vumovah globalizacii ekonomiky ta social'no-ekonomichni vygody vid ii vykorystannja [Remote employment in the conditions of globalization of economy and socio-economic benefits from its use].Ukraina: aspektypraci, no.3, pp. 6–12.
13. Gulevych O. (2010). Transformacija zajnjatosti u sferi poslug vid vplyvom rozvytku informacijnyh tehnologij [Transformation of employment in services from influence of development of information technologies]. Ukraina: aspektypraci, no.2, pp. 10–13.
14. Banning D. (2005). ExecutiveSummary: Survey of Freelance Journalists, available at: http://www.mediabistro.com/ mbtoolbox/watercooler/survey_says_19975.htm.
15. Gareis K., Lilischkis S., Mentrup A. (2005). Mapping the mobilee work forcein Europe. Available at: http://empirica.com/publikationen/documents/Gareisea_MVW_2005.pdf.
16. Goodwin B. (2006). Government becomes UK’slargestemployer of freelance IT workers. Available at: http://www.computerweekly.com/Articles/2006/01/17/213729/government-beco....
17. Salazar C. (2001). Building Boundaries and Negotiating Workat Home. Computing and Software Systems, University of Washington, Tacoma.
18. Bailey D.E, Kurland N.B. (2002). A review of telework research: findings, new directions, and lessons for the study of modern work. Centerfor Work, Technology and Organization, Department of Management Scienceand Engineering. Stanford University, USA.
19. Zadorozhna S.M. Rozvytok instytutu zapozychenoi praci v postindustrialnomu suspilstvi [Development of the Borrowed Labor Institute in Post-Industrial Society]. Available at: http://www.nbuv.gov.ua/portal/ Soc_Gum/Vcndtu/2011_48/5.htm
20. Pro zajnjatist naselennja [On employment of the population]: ZakonUkrainy vid 01.01.2013, no.5 067-VI. Data onovlennja: 13.02.2020. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/5067-17 (data zvernennja: 20.03.2020).
21. Racette D. (2018). Exploring Freelance Business Practices. Available at: http://www.atanet.org/chronicle/feature_article_ october2007_freelance.php.
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
 kryvosheieva_v._vasyurenko_l._1-2020.pdf | 1.57 MB |